Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-07.txt

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Mon, 08 March 2021 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEDF3A1495 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:21:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKHO1G83HD4B for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7619C3A149E for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049287.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 128H5BOA021145 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:21:26 -0500
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 374r65wfbg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:21:25 -0500
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 128HLOa4003444 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:21:25 -0600
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [135.46.181.157]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 128HLIn0003274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:21:18 -0600
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 233F4403A434 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:21:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clph811.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.107.12]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id EC3E6403A430 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:21:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clph811.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 128HLHxJ040904 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:21:17 -0600
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.255.15]) by clph811.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 128HLDQu040673 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:21:13 -0600
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njbdcas1.research.att.com [135.197.255.61]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFCC10A18C9 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:21:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njbdcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::8c6b:4b77:618f:9a01%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0513.000; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:21:32 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHXFDqx8/ROcaIn5EOnCQN5wnPtY6p6Ukkw
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:21:32 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0147CA9001@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <161522199893.18421.6292433061868681827@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161522199893.18421.6292433061868681827@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [50.234.13.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-08_14:2021-03-08, 2021-03-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103080091
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/XNnBAwzKCF3X_Liy2bXSr-fX7BM>
Subject: Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:22:03 -0000

Hi IPPM,

Rüdiger, Len and I are in the process of resolving an IESG ballot DISCUSS and many other comments.

We reached the point where many changes were made in the working text, and we all wanted to see the changes in their complete context to resolve the last few issues with e-mail, and discussion during the WG session.

Some of the comment resolutions involve a more complete knowledge of the protocol used to support capacity measurements. As a result, we are making a description of the current open-source protocol in [0]. Some of the comments on the metric and method WG draft have implications on the additional features we might need in a future protocol to make the standard measurements. We seek more comments from the IPPM WG, of course.

Thanks for your attention! Have a good IETF week!
Al

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-protocol/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 11:47 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-07.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement WG of the
> IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Metrics and Methods for One-way IP Capacity
>         Authors         : Al Morton
>                           Ruediger Geib
>                           Len Ciavattone
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 29
> 	Date            : 2021-03-08
> 
> Abstract:
>    This memo revisits the problem of Network Capacity metrics first
>    examined in RFC 5136.  The memo specifies a more practical Maximum
>    IP-layer Capacity metric definition catering for measurement
>    purposes, and outlines the corresponding methods of measurement.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-
> ippm-capacity-metric-
> method/__;!!BhdT!1qPn1BuxOCDWYZSTKIDcDz4b2pC8GlvVvqMaOiSNYACE15DTt4lVs8ycb
> BNu$
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-
> capacity-metric-method-
> 07__;!!BhdT!1qPn1BuxOCDWYZSTKIDcDz4b2pC8GlvVvqMaOiSNYACE15DTt4lVs51XPrqq$
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-
> ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-
> 07__;!!BhdT!1qPn1BuxOCDWYZSTKIDcDz4b2pC8GlvVvqMaOiSNYACE15DTt4lVsyQpxBPa$
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-
> ippm-capacity-metric-method-
> 07__;!!BhdT!1qPn1BuxOCDWYZSTKIDcDz4b2pC8GlvVvqMaOiSNYACE15DTt4lVs_Jser8k$
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-
> drafts/__;!!BhdT!1qPn1BuxOCDWYZSTKIDcDz4b2pC8GlvVvqMaOiSNYACE15DTt4lVs8aUq
> Hwq$
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm__;!
> !BhdT!1qPn1BuxOCDWYZSTKIDcDz4b2pC8GlvVvqMaOiSNYACE15DTt4lVszfnpeBQ$