[ippm] request the WG adoption for PM on LAG

["[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>]

Dear IPPM Chairs,

We believe the attached two drafts about PM on LAG are mature and stable enough for WG adoption after meeting presentation and list discussion. The sample implementations of our vendors have been incorparated in their comercial release  and deployed in our field network. The results show that the proposed solution can test the accurate perfromace including delay, jitter and packet loss of each member link in the trunk. The accuracy of delay, jitter is usec which is enough for us and for the service requirement. 

So, could you please start the adoption call? Thank you very much. 

The links and abstracts of the two drafts are given below for your reference. 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/ 
This document extends Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol
   (STAMP) to implement performance measurement on every member link of
   a Link Aggregation Group (LAG).  Knowing the measured metrics of each
   member link of a LAG enables operators to enforce a performance based
   traffic steering policy across the member links.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/ This document defines extensions to One-way Active Measurement
   Protocol (OWAMP), and Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) to
   implement performance measurement on every member link of a Link
   Aggregation Group (LAG).  Knowing the measured metrics of each member
   link of a LAG enables operators to enforce the performance based
   traffic steering policy across the member links.


Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li

[e-mail]