[ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3393 (6981)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 26 May 2022 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352E2C157B5E for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 03:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xAKcPBzAane for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2022 03:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4026BC157B5D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2022 03:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 01D35E530F; Thu, 26 May 2022 03:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org, carlo.demichelis@tilab.com, chimento@torrentnet.com, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220526101428.01D35E530F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 03:14:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/XzeW4CWTbLPFq9bNVbr94bOI5b8>
Subject: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3393 (6981)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 10:14:32 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3393,
"IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6981

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org>

Section: 2.7.1

Original Text
-------------
      It is the claim here (see remarks in section 1.3) that the effects
      of skew are rather small over the time scales that we are
      discussing here, since temperature variations in a system tend to
      be slow relative to packet inter-transmission times and the range
      of drift is so small.


Corrected Text
--------------
      It is the claim here (see remarks in section 1.4) that the effects
      of skew are rather small over the time scales that we are
      discussing here, since temperature variations in a system tend to
      be slow relative to packet inter-transmission times and the range
      of drift is so small.


Notes
-----
Incorrect reference - 1.3 instead 1.4

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3393 (draft-ietf-ippm-ipdv-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
Publication Date    : November 2002
Author(s)           : C. Demichelis, P. Chimento
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IP Performance Measurement
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG