Re: [ippm] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-morton-ippm-rt-loss-01.txt

Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54F93A6B9B for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.598, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tXIm8a00JZqC for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og119.obsmtp.com (exprod7og119.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F7723A6B94 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([209.36.247.244]) by exprod7ob119.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTLOM+AqWmP4kafF+C7KXhn6G5kQmvYE9@postini.com; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:17:28 PDT
Received: from milexhtca2.ds.jdsu.net ([10.75.2.122]) by Outbound1.jdsu.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:04:12 -0700
Received: from MILEXCH1.ds.jdsu.net ([fe80::6444:f010:6d40:bdb]) by milexhtca2.ds.jdsu.net ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:04:12 -0700
From: Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com>
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:04:10 -0700
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-morton-ippm-rt-loss-01.txt
Thread-Index: ActmKdlCxnQFqW83RQ64+r2R5vOq0gDZevEg
Message-ID: <94DEE80C63F7D34F9DC9FE69E39436BE38BA6A5525@MILEXCH1.ds.jdsu.net>
References: <201010062111.o96LB99k008364@klpd017.kcdc.att.com> <94DEE80C63F7D34F9DC9FE69E39436BE38BA5B6E3F@MILEXCH1.ds.jdsu.net> <201010071413.o97EDa0u017703@klpd017.kcdc.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <201010071413.o97EDa0u017703@klpd017.kcdc.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2010 22:04:12.0923 (UTC) FILETIME=[3CF72CB0:01CB6990]
Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-morton-ippm-rt-loss-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:16:16 -0000

Hi Al,

I would support this work, not interested in directly contributing, and would periodically provide comments.

Thanks,

Barry



-----Original Message-----
From: Al Morton [mailto:acmorton@att.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:14 AM
To: Barry Constantine; ippm@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [ippm] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-morton-ippm-rt-loss-01.txt

Hi Barry,

At 09:23 AM 10/7/2010, Barry Constantine wrote:
>I reviewed the document and have one comment / question.
>
>Should this draft discuss implications of packet re-ordering to 
>round trip loss metrics (in the context of RFC4737)?

I think so, there are certainly implications to the return path
sampling process if the reordering occurs in the forward direction,
and the Src and Dst sequence numbers will not line-up, even if there
is no loss concurrent with the reordering...

Thanks for your review.  I'll try to update this again before the
meeting.  If I've overlooked some implications, let me know...

Would you support this as a chartered WG item?

Al