[ippm] IPPM status

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Mon, 26 March 2012 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BE021F84B6 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31oIfw1Sjk6L for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7596021F8472 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2Q8AXAu016768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:10:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4F702478.7030109@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:10:32 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: [ippm] IPPM status
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:11:17 -0000

IPPM group,

As I won't be able to attend and present in Paris this afternoon, here is the
usual status update of the IPPM WG.  Questions/comments to the list please.

The general plan is to finish the drafts under (1), (3) and (4).  If no other
topics that generate sufficient discussion have come up by the time the last
document is finished, close the WG.

Slides for this afternoon will be online soon.

Henk


IPPM status as of 26/3/2012.
============================

1. Drafts in the various publication queues:
   * draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest
   * draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode
   * draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics
   * draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-03

2. Drafts declarered dead after the last meeting:
   * Draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt
   * RFC5136 update

3. Drafts not discussed today:
   * draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets
     Some comments received, new version published, can go to WGLC after this
     meeting

4. Drafts discussed today:
   * draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679
   * draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2680
     Should this be a WG document?
   * draft-morton-ippm-rate-problem-02


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)