IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9148E1321AE; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uL0FwLYkmZK1; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E84C1321C6; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049458.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v7GEPc4l013456; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:27:43 -0400
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2ccqmn8nhu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:27:43 -0400
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7GERfr1047312; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:27:42 -0500
Received: from dalint02.pst.cso.att.com (dalint02.pst.cso.att.com [135.31.133.160]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7GERcSA047306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:27:38 -0500
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (clpi183.sldc.sbc.com [135.41.1.46]) by dalint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:27:21 GMT
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7GERLgQ029957; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:27:21 -0500
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.178.11]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7GERC07029357; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:27:12 -0500
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas2.research.att.com [135.207.255.47]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF282F042F; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:27:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njmtexg4.research.att.com ([fe80::8cd:baa3:219e:5bd4]) by njmtcas2.research.att.com ([fe80::d550:ec84:f872:cad9%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:27:11 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTFphoFBNwAso1NEypXfJkx55u/6KHB78w
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:27:11 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF46C047E9@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
References: <150289218210.12476.14285511463611207073.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150289218210.12476.14285511463611207073.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [73.178.187.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-16_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1708160238
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/bLW8OP9aKyAws4w_6X3FVYy50x8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:27:52 -0000

Hi Alvaro, just replying as someone from IPPM who is not on vacation...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:03 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: ippm-chairs@ietf.org; ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with
> COMMENT)
...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I fully support this update.
> 
> However, is the intent to change the name of the WG at the same time? The
> Internal Review announcement, as well as the write-ups talk about "IP
> Performance Metrics", but the first line of the charter says "IP Performance
> Measurement" instead.  I don't object to the name change, it may in fact be a
> better reflection of the work, but I think it is a process issue (if the name
> is to be changed) that should be addressed before approval.
[ACM] 
Yes, the name change is intentional, so the process 
should reflect that aspect as well. I don't think
this small change should be viewed as creating a 
new working group, or that the change should
separate the literature of the WG before/after 
this name/charter.  If there are more serious 
implications than the WG anticipated, I would 
like to understand them better.

thanks and regards,
Al

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ippm&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=A3792Yd9AQ0JTy76m6cA8jS6O0N
> zxVWtdP6P0zP-7bM&s=4m3lTS4Cbq4ikN2Hq0ny11l2eANpNR53uHs-jZWkViU&e=

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email