IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 August 2017 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCCA12EC06; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rCDWT8YQNOW6; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FC6B13239D; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n83so4842031ywn.2; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DHBVMQ/2de5F7JWka+Ui5+hNvJd9q4t/FilphLaEMaw=; b=XW9125Z573qoAqONuu1dGoNv2CgakSIYg52CzkVUN2rFv0RLCkovgUTqlxlo/lREyK l1r4Pd7u7UM6nsaeUcW2JOv9SJQBHKUItcDDxDun4qIEFUIFZ+llFqyDtfelzKLbsYxc dbFwuEoj+Gtb3QYHxmcvAs4cmizYZIbHXoVc2aEwxDkCSdQH34jimE+7gJVQ2P7NjTCi 0gA+lzzn6bmAk80XPixtvGkobTtBV4sGwVcb5Kz4Dxt1faNQ9aEeRmFoDeI6IIlTLlI6 XQdTG67aYFr2XwT28A+sB9ku0bD4oc+VxuGCMe5XplXaP1LBGbYOu/RfYulQfWlkisF0 xh0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DHBVMQ/2de5F7JWka+Ui5+hNvJd9q4t/FilphLaEMaw=; b=TmmVE27DK6LH7e9kLShCQzp02TPWJVSSKs9HcoNN009co0WYXESdGUY/YBo6piFgDw Qr98mnt2MLtRizpDxxpZScMCRsNk70UYThqDPK5swTdDeCufpPrcUk/frmBkFx8SPm0c C5XrfycVh6D+nrTe6tTTUlipslGuB0yzw+Tar+HJZ2O+Xp1Zwc9V82o9BwNWWWektvUO wYuJw46rSksQ/JfB9dZvwwsJnD1ZFfIHnEJ9ggMSW6Lf8ajCitHQHncJr1BOtk6jZo3L KwYPMM9HQNCbRmXDybG0sAypiispqDfjncDTtkT/Ewe4vP4v5YbgUfv6SVQ2R+kLkWNH DFIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h41EZnzaFdhshNxnHSgeqjrtGlIvuFqNxAmtaxKA3VLR8BwUb6 UrKTYSV9VeCyFYxWh4JrOlTxTSa2gA==
X-Received: by 10.37.66.146 with SMTP id p140mr3067833yba.170.1502931689426; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.40.194 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C98E32F0-15B3-4972-8DFA-713999C61287@cisco.com>
References: <150289218210.12476.14285511463611207073.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF46C047E9@njmtexg4.research.att.com> <C98E32F0-15B3-4972-8DFA-713999C61287@cisco.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:01:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fvR_DHS4pHAmNvkScQJyjtTyeoNK-FQZoC0yVN2otXmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Cc: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c015be786da90556e88dd1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/qN24r06l7gDH4ykok3QK-HR9U5U>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 01:01:33 -0000

Hi, Alvaro,

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Al:
>
> Hi!
>
> No, I don’t think there are more serious implications.  We just need the
> process to show what is being done – right now there is a small (but
> important) inconsistency.
>
> We changed the name of the pim WG last year, where the acronym, the list,
> the archives, etc..were all maintained.  It is possible!
>
> Thanks!
>

Thank you for spotting this - I think this is just a race condition between
renaming and rechartering.

Since you've done this recently and I've never done it - do you think I
need to do more than make sure the Secretariat spots this, so they can
change the name anywhere it needs to be changed? (I'd like for the
announcement of the recharter to have the new name, for instance)

Spencer


> Alvaro.
>
> On 8/16/17, 10:27 AM, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, the name change is intentional, so the process
> should reflect that aspect as well. I don't think
> this small change should be viewed as creating a
> new working group, or that the change should
> separate the literature of the WG before/after
> this name/charter.  If there are more serious
> implications than the WG anticipated, I would
> like to understand them better.
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email