IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ippm] Network Benchmarking Considerations Draft

Russ White <ruwhite@cisco.com> Thu, 12 February 2004 14:22 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA25068 for <ippm-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:22:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArHiA-0006sY-HX; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:21:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArHJB-0004XC-56 for ippm@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:55:13 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24037 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:55:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArHJ5-0006Kf-00 for ippm@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:55:08 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArHIA-0006Fj-00 for ippm@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:54:11 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArHHU-00065L-00 for ippm@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:53:28 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2004 05:51:00 -0800
Received: from cisco.com (shako.cisco.com [64.102.17.78]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i1CDqthu025051 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:52:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rtp-vpn2-219.cisco.com [10.82.240.219]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA06131 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:52:56 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:52:55 -0500
From: Russ White <ruwhite@cisco.com>
Reply-To: Russ White <riw@cisco.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.53.0402120848230.3460@russpc.Whitehouse.intra>
X-X-Sender: ruwhite@shako.cisco.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [ippm] Network Benchmarking Considerations Draft
Sender: ippm-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ippm-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org >
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org >
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=subscribe>

Y'all:

A while back, I posted Considerations in Benchmarking Routing Protocol
Network Convergence, draft-white-network-benchmark-01.txt, to BMWG. This is
slated to be an individual contribution/informational RFC, since it doesn't
appear to fit within BMWG's purview, nor any other WG. I've recently posted
the -01 version of this draft, but it's probably stuck in a queue
someplace, and it's identical to the -00 version, other than date changes,
anyway.

So, I'd like to get any comments on this I can. I've asked Alex (the
Routing AD) to place it into last call as an individual
submission/informational at this point.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-network-benchmark-00.txt

Thanks!

:-)

Russ

__________________________________
riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone



_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email