IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFC31321B8; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qdahpfSrn4vx; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9F81321A7; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1106; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1502894499; x=1504104099; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=tP9y/aqIWyD1I8ggjk9mx4gosZLVHwO9IhFHfE+yQ8U=; b=VLQ09NEzNThJbHCzugq6BD0pdMHtUU9vyEvwjXZAqsfRivDTZ6sU7avh IJjP/jQ3r3p6nLC40mTsaE2iWR9XtpZDfmHajuHgGSREfmoRcp59ZPZ8Y j7XcQp/vHv4comZe6T0QmXqQIkZvFNSYS1wcDAQHDw7+vhBilNmBwknxF I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DRAgAfWZRZ/49dJa1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1qBeQeeHoFMljuCEoVHAhqEKUEWAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQYjEUUQAgEIGgImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWKMKsugiaLYgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BC4IdggKBTIIOC4JxhHODEzCCMQEEkROHBogsApRAklyWGgEmBC2BCncVSRIBhwd2iFOBDwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,383,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="273050260"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2017 14:41:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7GEfdul020481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:41:39 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:41:38 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:41:38 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTFphjRgmdCipmsE26vZOwnHNhDqKHXh+A///A/AA=
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:41:38 +0000
Message-ID: <C98E32F0-15B3-4972-8DFA-713999C61287@cisco.com>
References: <150289218210.12476.14285511463611207073.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF46C047E9@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF46C047E9@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.22.0.170515
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.196.156]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A2311EEFD622A744806E52ADA6F84C9F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/byF-Yd0Fo3kz8LxO2k1g01SEexw>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Yes on charter-ietf-ippm-05-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:41:41 -0000

Al:

Hi!

No, I don’t think there are more serious implications.  We just need the process to show what is being done – right now there is a small (but important) inconsistency.

We changed the name of the pim WG last year, where the acronym, the list, the archives, etc..were all maintained.  It is possible!

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On 8/16/17, 10:27 AM, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> wrote:

Yes, the name change is intentional, so the process 
should reflect that aspect as well. I don't think
this small change should be viewed as creating a 
new working group, or that the change should
separate the literature of the WG before/after 
this name/charter.  If there are more serious 
implications than the WG anticipated, I would 
like to understand them better.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email