[ippm] IPPM @ IETF89 Administrative Notes
William Cerveny <ippm@wjcerveny.com> Tue, 25 February 2014 22:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ippm@wjcerveny.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7ED1A07C1 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:11:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCnrajlQaOzU for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:11:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF501A0298 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CDB21231 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:11:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:11:02 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=OtqGOM4+/olBrpkguC1X6nXBNgY=; b=JEwGhhsps4zF3TnXX9VFxs1Kfp/G Bw8jkj+pPHyL1jvHFCiwV9UjIab7F3+q40gTtaL1/RKJ4vBrztKUeIZPmadGeEC4 fg0PqDa6c5JnKh4ETgo4DPPY6b3Qye4KBC4EyzO+WzaG3via/OMvEk+U+xKzeGC2 h44rqawF1WxMS+I=
Received: by web1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id E4BACF00B0D; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:11:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1393366261.3773.87776589.500E85A8@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: OO18AN8kZlqHhELHbcUhSBLqHEorcBmmUQ5PKJOMfyTr 1393366261
From: William Cerveny <ippm@wjcerveny.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-4527a23f
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:11:01 -0500
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/c09CS5BLXjpU4hkd9tqQOn_Pho8
Subject: [ippm] IPPM @ IETF89 Administrative Notes
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 22:11:07 -0000
Dear IPPM participants, As we approach IPPM@IETF89 Monday, March, 3, 2014 (at 1300 UTC/GMT), please note the following: - We need note takers and jabber scribes. Please let us know if you can be a note taker or jabber scribe. - As the IPPM meeting is on Monday at 1300UTC/GMT, I would appreciate it if presenters can provide slides to me as soon as possible, optimistically by Friday, February 28. Things get pretty busy at IETF meetings and it would be really helpful if I can have these slides to post by Friday. - The current working group documents are listed at the top of http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ippm/ . Five of these documents have been updated since the last IETF. draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update is in working group last call until Friday, March 7 and draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec will begin WGLC on Monday, March 3. Comments regarding any of the working group documents are encouraged. Discussion at the meeting will be more lively if participants read the drafts and have comments ready. - A cornerstone of the meeting will be a presentation of the outcome of the IPPM registry design team, including introduction of three documents to be considered for working group adoption consideration. IPPM participants are encouraged to review the three registry documents and be ready for discussion. These three documents are: -- draft-manyfolks-ippm-metric-registry http://tools.ietf.org/html?draft=draft-manyfolks-ippm-metric-registry -- draft-mornuley-ippm-registry-active http://tools.ietf.org/html?draft=draft-mornuley-ippm-registry-active -- draft-akhter-ippm-registry-passive http://tools.ietf.org/html?draft=draft-akhter-ippm-registry-passive - Participants should feel free to post their comments on any IPPM WG related draft to the IPPM mailing list. Having "talking-points" from the list will improve the quality of discussion at the meeting. - The meeting will be on Meetecho. See http://ietf89.conf.meetecho.com/ Regards, Bill Cerveny Brian Trammell IPPM WG Co-chairs
- [ippm] IPPM @ IETF89 Administrative Notes William Cerveny