[ippm] Metric validation: new version of draft-geib-ippm-metrictest-01
<Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de> Mon, 26 October 2009 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9658628C26A for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.716
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.716 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.534, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id la39cvcjB0Ir for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail33.telekom.de (tcmail33.telekom.de [194.25.30.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EF928C259 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s4de8psaans.blf.telekom.de (HELO s4de8psaans.mitte.t-com.de) ([10.151.180.168]) by tcmail31.telekom.de with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2009 13:01:52 +0100
Received: from S4DE8PSAAQA.mitte.t-com.de ([10.151.229.12]) by s4de8psaans.mitte.t-com.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:52 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:51 +0100
Message-ID: <151C164FE2E066418D8D44D0801543A50266758D@S4DE8PSAAQA.mitte.t-com.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
thread-topic: Metric validation: new version of draft-geib-ippm-metrictest-01
thread-index: AcpWMpxdfpnQ8R1aQmq8v2uQpMqQfQAAByYQ
From: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
To: ippm@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2009 12:01:52.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B060D30:01CA5634]
Subject: [ippm] Metric validation: new version of draft-geib-ippm-metrictest-01
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:01:51 -0000
Dear all, the reviewed draft -01 is available under http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-geib-ippm-metrictest-01.txt First inputs of Al Morton's draft has been added. More may come, to this regard the document isn't complete. What it is offering now is a metric implementation procedure: - compliance test single implementation against specification - statistical compliance test for precision of a single implementation - statistical compliance test for precision of multiple implementations - Statistical test success criterion: document 95% confidence interval of the smallest precision, where this test was passed. No quantified minimum precision is required to be standards compliant. Regards, Ruediger -----Original Message----- From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 12:50 PM To: Geib, Rüdiger Cc: acmorton@att.com; RFardid@covad.com Subject: New Version Notification for draft-geib-ippm-metrictest-01 A new version of I-D, draft-geib-ippm-metrictest-01.txt has been successfuly submitted by Ruediger Geib and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-geib-ippm-metrictest Revision: 01 Title: IPPM standard compliance testing Creation_date: 2009-10-26 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 19 Abstract: This document specifies tests to determine if multiple, independent, and interoperable implementations of a metrics specification document are at hand so that the metrics specification can be advanced to an Internet standard. Results of different IPPM implementations can be compared if they measure under the same underlying network conditions. Results are compared using state of the art statistical methods. The IETF Secretariat. -------- Deutsche Telekom Netzproduktion GmbH Zentrum Technik Einführung Technik Internet Backbone, TE142-19 Rüdiger Geib Heinrich Hertz Str. 3-7 64297 Darmstadt Tel.: 06151/6282747 Fax: 0251/7985109 Deutsche Telekom Netzproduktion GmbH Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Steffen Roehn (Vorsitzender) Geschäftsführung: Dr. Bruno Jacobfeuerborn (Vorsitzender), Albert Matheis, Klaus Peren Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 14190 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn USt-IdNr.: DE 814645262
- [ippm] Metric validation: new version of draft-ge… Ruediger.Geib