[ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6576 (3326)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 20 August 2012 14:41 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854D021F8674 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrNIZIA4lkJ9 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD6521F84C8 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 73BB9B1E004; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de, acmorton@att.com, rfardid@cariden.com, Alexander.Steinmitz@telekom.de, wes@mti-systems.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, matt@internet2.edu, henk@uijterwaal.nl
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120820144003.73BB9B1E004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:40:03 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 07:43:02 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, acmorton@att.com, ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6576 (3326)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:41:53 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6576, "IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Standard Advancement Testing". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6576&eid=3326 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Section: 3. Original Text ------------- <none, this is an omission> Corrected Text -------------- New Section 3.7 Errata Evaluation The process of evaluating each metric RFC MUST include an examination of the current Errata for possible inclusion in the revised text. Notes ----- This omission pointed out by Brian Carpenter Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6576 (draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-05) -------------------------------------- Title : IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Standard Advancement Testing Publication Date : March 2012 Author(s) : R. Geib, Ed., A. Morton, R. Fardid, A. Steinmitz Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : IP Performance Metrics Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6576 (3326) RFC Errata System