[ippm] A question about the draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sun, 07 November 2021 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBA63A106A; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 10:41:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v92h_Kr3_i6S; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 10:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ABC53A1060; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 10:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id r12so53674702edt.6; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:41:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zoWWsZ0ySXr6KTXJDHblo2IvW7Eq0Kkp14m+uuUO/Gc=; b=IpOHdNRLwWBkIftIX8XostdxgsWql4sUYC7UKibiuZIlrihv7i53gOcs34DxauuAl/ ePdbO1i7ILhrsgd2YmI97OpVHIUhnvOtYA3PgyHsDStpRZXRn/KzlNTpZecVb2z/tnOM ehn14DC9+jGoqLUZW9BS0XXvEgB9jI8Jks3+6cHLvicPBVaLivt/Z7WgEWF+VCqUtqPZ 3E4N/vTC0ZdlBf5zCU1XtnJbm0u9qV824273yU81XUxjCviNziHbP718EHlSfySI7AVm IR85bt6iUEflKUj3g0KaYk/zW3HCvYO2SFjg1elJM+RWeXuhAJwVrhVBGeOyPmeuIEDT APtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zoWWsZ0ySXr6KTXJDHblo2IvW7Eq0Kkp14m+uuUO/Gc=; b=ADSTrF1C6sXJpP2jfh20FG4FqyejEbW1gJGpkg3qkikCjoCGg8tPOha/dRO386a8x1 IgV7vxM6WCpmqc1+X2I7hcnKeBjt7Qd/VbWXNmwpRmw268lPao2lqxMn7rkMdCvgGKPI CsUaJrrVxIK9qfZnAgJNspRRenFvY7LSGwH5//DONigPk/D51lM6j6oWSXv9MStC/M9J 7ycczNCSXTED6pxi4IdWj/W9sCaEObWbB2KiWqhVIULxTgp99ICfL2RJaKtCw2H1rnbE NRx8L7dpn9st1ITyQtLuVUTrCs4s78cFt+XSyt/yHjYrYPnRX/4s5reaDN8wCBQ7uQG3 EotQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532whXxwm/5jrTA50ssWd5qsKuQqc1CUXjUA4gzCE7HsXh3vmG6C NvhhjzF4620azVhVywoLNfdB9hAQ/cLJBrx+Vrj6RynR
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/xJSE7Iq2ZD3uRPG+Mu+GsgYRa10cb3Sord4kxu5jblMbEQzFbeFLiHoba4EY5ymup3LwSmOt3CRIqX/TNiQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:327:: with SMTP id q7mr88119782edw.126.1636310480278; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:41:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:41:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVh=vfrP3cmS41jk9TXZ0rCyDFqc8MTQ+nVZ0WQyh1H4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: spring@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb567605d0373805"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/emqqTKN_XAgSmRx7IOjzQiiepT8>
Subject: [ippm] A question about the draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 18:41:31 -0000
Dear All, I've read the latest available version of the draft and I still cannot find the answer I've asked during the WG AP of this document: What is the value the publication of this informational document can add? Besides ASCII-art figures, I find references to RFCs (though the normative reference to the experimental RFC doesn't seem helpful) and one IPPM WG document but nothing that is specific to the Segment Routing or STAMP. What am I missing? Regards, Greg