Re: [ippm] [spring] New Draft draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm

Hi Greg,

Thanks for your comments. We can add following summary in the draft for
STAMP. Please advise if the text is correct.

  The Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP)
   [I-D.ippm-stamp] extends TWAMP by alleviating control channel
   signaling to setup test channel and supports IEEE 1588 timestamp
   format.  The STAMP defines mechanisms such as using the TCP port of
   control channel for test channel, using configuration data model to
   provision test channels and using responder node in reflector mode
   for two-way measurement.  The TWAMP Light from broadband forum
   [BBF.TR-390] provides simplified mechanisms for active performance
   measurement in Customer Edge IP networks.

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:30 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rakesh,
> thank you for bringing this draft up for discussion. There was not enough
> time to ask questions at the SPRING WG meeting and this is a very good
> opportunity.
> I understand that you've proposed to use RFC 6374 to encode PM operations
> and measurements.. Also, you've referenced work on OWAMP and TWAMP. But I
> don't find any reference to STAMP
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-01>in the draft. How
> would you position STAMP, its optional extensions
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-01>, and YANG
> model <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-01> in
> comparison with your new draft?
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <
> rgandhi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi WG,
>>
>>
>>
>> We like to introduce following new draft that was presented to SPRING WG
>> yesterday.
>>
>>
>>
>> This draft defines IP/UDP path for sending probe query messages for delay
>> and loss measurement that is agnostics to data plane (SR-MPLS/SRv6/IP) and
>> does not require to bootstrap PM session.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm/
>>
>>
>>
>> You may find presentation in the following package (it is the second
>> draft).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-spring-13-performance-measurement-in-sr-networks-00
>>
>>
>>
>> We welcome your comments and suggestions.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rakesh (On behalf of authors and contributors)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>