[ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Tue, 11 September 2018 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05A4130FF2; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mOVL6vL1MOe; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83473130F34; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 00A62F0A362C3; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 02:12:24 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.49) by LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 02:12:24 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.7]) by dggeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:12:19 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: spring <spring@ietf.org>
CC: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm
Thread-Index: AdRJbGlD0dKzTMmeRKC4ZAeuWsJEag==
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 01:12:19 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE29263AB94@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.194.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/--leXkf8_uHrx8IlWNrSqMIsoKU>
Subject: [ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 01:12:28 -0000

Hi Authors,
 
The draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment and draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment define the notion of path segment identifier. Could you please consider adding some text in draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm and draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and how it is applicable to performance measurement in segment routing?
 
Best regards
Mach