IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 12 September 2018 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FB9130DC1; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vz93aTvNm13; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C998130DCD; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7FAAE36782477; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 03:32:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.40) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 03:32:50 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.7]) by dggeml423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:32:43 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, spring <spring@ietf.org>
CC: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm
Thread-Index: AQHUScnDT6yM7jL8dky5UDpY/GMOVKTr7eww
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 02:32:42 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE292642D01@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <FEE58B2B-0ED3-441E-8321-669240F5C9C9@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FEE58B2B-0ED3-441E-8321-669240F5C9C9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.194.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/wZQ7E7XthXVvnHJp2dyt-VXobyA>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 02:32:56 -0000

Hi Rakesh,

Thanks for considering my comments!

Best regards,
Mach 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) [mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 8:20 PM
> To: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>; spring <spring@ietf.org>
> Cc: ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [ippm] Comments on draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm and draft-
> gandhi-spring-udp-pm
> 
> Thanks Mach for the review comments. We will add following text in the
> next revision of the documents.
> 
> 1.  Loss Measurement
> 
>   The path segment identifier [I-D.spring-mpls-path-segment]
>    [I-D.pce-sr-path-segment] of the SR Policy is required for accounting
>    received traffic on the egress node for loss measurement.
> 
> 2. Two-way End-to-end Measurement of SR Policy
> 
>    The path segment identifier [I-D.spring-mpls-path-segment]
>    [I-D.pce-sr-path-segment] of the forward SR Policy can be used to
>    find the reverse SR Policy to send the probe response message.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rakesh
> 
> 
> On 2018-09-10, 9:12 PM, "ippm on behalf of Mach Chen" <ippm-
> bounces@ietf.org on behalf of mach.chen@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Authors,
> 
>     The draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment and draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-
> segment define the notion of path segment identifier. Could you please
> consider adding some text in draft-gandhi-spring-udp-pm and draft-gandhi-
> spring-sr-mpls-pm and how it is applicable to performance measurement in
> segment routing?
> 
>     Best regards
>     Mach
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     ippm mailing list
>     ippm@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email