[ippm] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: (with COMMENT)
Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 30 June 2022 10:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EFFC15A73F; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 03:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, tpauly@apple.com, tpauly@apple.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <165658616323.26118.3021902863916385708@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 03:49:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/gqD_uTlSyLvjsieKW8GOYKKRKh8>
Subject: [ippm] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:49:23 -0000
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support John's Discuss. One Minor comment that matches the comment that I put on the DEX document. 2. N >> M I'm assuming that by ">>", this means much greater than? It would be better use words here, or at least define what this means (e.g., as opposed to a bit-shift). Thanks, Rob
- [ippm] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf… Robert Wilton via Datatracker