RE: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement draft
"Robert Holley \(rholley\)" <rholley@cisco.com> Tue, 31 July 2007 15:26 UTC
Return-path: <ippm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IFtcf-0007G5-Fp; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:26:57 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IFtce-0007Ex-EW for ippm@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:26:56 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IFtcd-0005mc-WC for ippm@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:26:56 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2007 11:26:55 -0400
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAHXxrkZAZnmf/2dsb2JhbAA
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.19,204,1183348800"; d="scan'208"; a="127522695:sNHT35859424"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6VFQt1u011947; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:26:55 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l6VFQoWI003244; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:26:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.13]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:26:49 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement draft
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:27:20 -0400
Message-ID: <9EF3C46DC5D14D44B218FD5E93786CA2049CA2DD@xmb-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <46AED750.2010807@ripe.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement draft
thread-index: AcfTPJZ39OyFxxVdQV6J3lBK+riFNwASe2Yg
References: <46AED750.2010807@ripe.net>
From: "Robert Holley (rholley)" <rholley@cisco.com>
To: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2007 15:26:49.0940 (UTC) FILETIME=[36F4B140:01C7D387]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2676; t=1185895615; x=1186759615; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rholley@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Robert=20Holley=20\(rholley\)=22=20<rholley@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[ippm]=20Packet=20Delay=20Variation=20Applicability=2 0Statement=20draft |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Henk=20Uijterwaal=22=20<henk@ripe.net>, =20=22IETF=20IPPM=20WG=2 2=20<ippm@ietf.org>; bh=xAFYEYEAs/G7KgYfk1BL6t/CihsIrFPdEiNK5j/7AJ8=; b=c1i9wBEhgYQX3DYFdpAdz1+54kfAM+VsTYS8P/rQRj422HwtzDWp0IySj8dnQq/X0Mkjslsf JQjy+Y4PI4wFUdoJNL5oXQAwdsRnN9dN5iBYWo8DfnVenDoiK1zgQfex;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=rholley@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0fa76816851382eb71b0a882ccdc29ac
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org >
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org >
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org
Henk, I am very interested in reading this in more detail and providing feedback. In any case, I think the topic is very timely and of significant relevance in the industry. Delay variation is one of the primary characteristics for IP service reliability/availability determinations and it is therefore very important that the measurements are carried out and reported in a consistent manner across the industry. Looking forward to the progress of this work. Regards Bob ============================================ Robert Holley US AS Network Infrastructure Cisco Systems 7025 Kit Creek Road. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Phone: +1 919-392-2359 Pager: +1 800-796-7363 pin 100-9187 ============================================ > -----Original Message----- > From: Henk Uijterwaal [mailto:henk@ripe.net] > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 2:32 AM > To: IETF IPPM WG > Subject: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement draft > > IPPM group, > > At the last couple of meetings, we have been discussing: > > Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement > draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-03 > > During the Chicago meeting, about 2 dozen of people indicated > that they > think this draft should become a working group item, while > nobody thought > the opposite. > > If you were amongst the people expressing interest, please > confirm this > by email. If you were not in Chicago, or if you disagree, > please let us > know as well. > > Please respond before the 14th of August. > > Matt & Henk > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > Henk Uijterwaal Email: > henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net > RIPE Network Coordination Centre > http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk > P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 > 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 > The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > > # Lawyer: "Now sir, I'm sure you are an intelligent and honest man--" > # Witness: "Thank you. If I weren't under oath, I'd return > the compliment." > > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
- [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability State… Henk Uijterwaal
- RE: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability S… Hedayat, Kaynam
- RE: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability S… Robert Holley (rholley)
- RE: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability S… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability S… Philip F. Chimento Jr.
- RE: [ippm] Packet Delay Variation Applicability S… STEPHAN Emile RD-CORE-LAN
- [ippm] Re: Packet Delay Variation Applicability S… Henk Uijterwaal