Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-09: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 06 May 2017 02:16 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D0F128B91; Fri, 5 May 2017 19:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GWpefyeUxRhm; Fri, 5 May 2017 19:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x229.google.com (mail-yb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 564051287A3; Fri, 5 May 2017 19:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id p143so1768461yba.2; Fri, 05 May 2017 19:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4pmCpgMrl2+Qq4KEM3z22KZnVuwsstPxeEgnzn8ApAo=; b=uwWfxGD3B7vMhFYNzF1S9dwVMzEJKb6ttKoDkQmUETgXfIj9N0n5RgVkf1S/GodL6w 0dNTUorp9Pq1QjKZc29j1bKZoKXGCox6obv5duAqVt04BL5PB8lMucGMN0Qca/SzWbt6 pppMQouuIUeBOYpusZ8CfFr6LR21IAFHZdnTCEvKFEwdDbmP4zl2UgnPKBTKjF901AGC SlRuoSYAcFaIMLkE689Nk/Dmh7zxhr9Tt9RD0uJypQ21/RyldclREZlI2G1UXCAQtQ7M f+YPbkZyI0/LCvreXlBxjtJlaIwp1uLi46EhxtWLCwvL+x67GJgfBb4UWu4Eq0AVnOYJ 9CMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4pmCpgMrl2+Qq4KEM3z22KZnVuwsstPxeEgnzn8ApAo=; b=uaAYGWMcrNxag1Li8lTg96cNwQSP5c10bdLcjhVrtDgnqrA+u57JM3hpj87dfJxxHT KkJH2qa57wt9He90cx6exzP8WFMCK4zaGOYlGhWAIyGiv23AW3V+A2WqwHY3IFhTQoNe RMVWWcYUFfODSTlDOtoL2cvKPYUN/QjLNm6G8bbf6sTco35int8VfpNy8FA7JQMnHtq8 KjEIIAD4WMFlm4JV61dIyN3895aDi6JO+adIOnO9q0Nhm7f7KC1fUEw5t7KxNy4Un7TG vhi42zDo3fipN6W8+NlJ9oQGu7NDGi47muedgWJOUsF7Jrb4vRT/CDJvOXSthlsc+xk+ Bfsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCEq82sNinrnNmN8GHzai8Yi8YN6oCgWMjrH0HNGAavOgmZPXJj omVNPO0C58eV5QivhLJZ7nNM43j53Q==
X-Received: by 10.37.177.32 with SMTP id g32mr1477135ybj.82.1494036971670; Fri, 05 May 2017 19:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.161.198 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2017 19:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+MiUmMLsMc64U++MT=uCUO58MHLdVzz+hfnh=fVh7Fhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1925618131.4324891.1493997263218.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1925618131.4324891.1493997263218@mail.yahoo.com> <CAHw9_i+MiUmMLsMc64U++MT=uCUO58MHLdVzz+hfnh=fVh7Fhw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 21:16:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cn_Yo2Gj9T1uWJ9bqL_2oj4tvs55Y8DO_JSX_r=UzM5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, ippm@ietf.org, Bill Cerveny <ietf@wjcerveny.com>, draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option@ietf.org, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e5564fa5a23054ed1961c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/jyEY7nQCJXb8s7vPsPVz5f0oBSs>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 02:16:14 -0000
Privately, On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote: > I'm still holding a DISCUSS on this - the proposed changes by Nalini > to address my concerns (earlier / in a different thread) are fine with > me and address my concerns. > Being unfamiliar with the custom (and blindly following the text on > the DISCUSS page) I'd originally said that I'd remove my discuss once > a new version was published - but I trust Spencer / the authors to > include the promised, and so am clearing my DISCUSS.... > I appreciate your kind thoughts and confidence. Of course, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust,_but_verify worked for Reagan ;-) Spencer
- [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… nalini.elkins
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… nalini.elkins
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Warren Kumari
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… nalini.elkins
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… nalini.elkins
- Re: [ippm] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… nalini.elkins