[ippm] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-09: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 29 June 2022 17:30 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, tpauly@apple.com, tpauly@apple.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <165652380236.27142.14985620134432899908@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:30:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/k970nDBXONECl0B_zPcuhQu8b3A>
Subject: [ippm] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-09: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this document. My only comment is that I don’t see why the
references to RFCs 7014 and 5475 are normative, they seem informative to me.

[ippm] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-… John Scudder via Datatracker