[ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-09: (with DISCUSS)
Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 29 June 2022 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17700C15AD28; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, tpauly@apple.com, tpauly@apple.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <165653760608.27520.5309528880057245173@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:20:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/loyRQ3AslkX7n578en996ehOAs0>
Subject: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:20:06 -0000
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Colin Perkins for his valuable TSVART review. I find the TSVART early reviewer's concern on rate limiting the exported traffic triggered by DEX Option-type as only protection mechanism (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/1WNgYWGJmxLd4f3RAiDk-LJ-S8Y/) very valid but haven't seen it addressed. In this discuss, I would like to bring back attention to that concern and would like to discuss why there should not be a circuit breaker kind of functionality required here? I also think this specification should be explicit about not exporting IOAM data to any receiver outside of IOAM limited domain. Hence supporting Roman's discuss. for example - The introduction section can state- OLD text- A "receiving entity" in this context can be, for example, an external collector, analyzer, controller, decapsulating node, or a software module in one of the IOAM nodes. New text- A "receiving entity" in this context can be, for example, an external collector, analyzer, controller, decapsulating node, or a software module in one of the IOAM nodes with in IOAM limited domain.
- [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-iet… Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft… Martin Duke
- Re: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [ippm] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft… Zaheduzzaman Sarker