Re: [ippm] RIPE NCC's implementation report for RFC2678-2681
"Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)" <henk@ripe.net> Tue, 27 July 2004 11:12 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA05357 for <ippm-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:12:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BpPqk-00050L-J9; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:10:26 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BpPnR-0004YW-EE for ippm@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:07:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA05039 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postman.ripe.net ([193.0.0.199]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BpPp1-0005MX-Uw for ippm@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:08:40 -0400
Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 1A81A4FF09; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:06:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496BA4EFF0 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:06:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cow.ripe.net (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239]) by birch.ripe.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6RB6S1o006279 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:06:28 +0200
Received: from localhost (henk@localhost) by cow.ripe.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i6RB6Svf002578 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:06:28 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: cow.ripe.net: henk owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:06:28 +0200
From: "Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)" <henk@ripe.net>
To: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ippm] RIPE NCC's implementation report for RFC2678-2681
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407271300340.8171@cow.ripe.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407271303270.8171@cow.ripe.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403040312060.8271@cow.ripe.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407271300340.8171@cow.ripe.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.001082 / 0.0 / 0.0 / disabled
X-RIPE-Signature: df6af4f1bdd7bf754b9fe3d000285b26
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3971661e40967acfc35f708dd5f33760
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org >
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org >
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ippm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org
IPPM group, Here is our (RIPE NCC)'s implementation report for RFC's 2678-2681. Mainly FYI and to act as a template if you planned to write one yourself. Henk - - - - - General ======= Name of Implementation: RIPE NCC Test Traffic Measurements (RIPE NCC TTM or TTM) Organization: RIPE NCC Contact details: RIPE NCC P.O.Box 10096, 1001 EB Amsterdam, the Netherlands Email: ttm@ripe.net URL: http://www.ripe.net/ttm Phone: +31.20.5354444 Origin of code: Written from scratch. Uses NTP (RFC1305) and BPF (from LBL) Platform: FreeBSD (versions 2.2.8, 4.5 and higher) Metrics ======= RFC2679/Type-P-One-way-Delay ---------------------------- Parameters: Implemented? + Src, the IP address of a host Yes + Dst, the IP address of a host Yes + T, a time Yes Units: + dT Yes Methodology: + According to section 3.6 of RFC 2679 Comments: + UDP packets are being used. + No special IP bits are set. Features included: + A bit to record if the src thinks its clock is synchronized or not (based on NTP). Measurements with unsynchronized clocks are not used in higher level statistics. + A bit to record if the dst thinks its clock is synchronized or not + Experimental error estimate for src clock + Experimental error estimate for dst clock + Experimental error estimate for the measurement + Ports used at source and destination Features not implemented: + No special IP bits can be set. Reporting the metric: + Negative delay values are reported. Small negative values can occur when the experimental errors on the clocks are large and the delays are small. + Maximum delay is 255 seconds, packets with higher delays are considered lost. + Packet size is being reported. + All systematic errors are removed from the timestamps before reporting the metrics + Paths are being determined by running the well-known traceroute tool approximately 10 times an hour, with the most recent path reported. Tests performed: + Cross check of measurements against the surveyor implementation (Reported at thet IETF44, IPPM WG meeting). + Cross check of measurements with passive measurements (Reported at PAM2001) RFC2679/Type-P-One-way-Delay-Poisson-Stream ------------------------------------------- Parameters: + Src, the IP address of a host Yes + Dst, the IP address of a host Yes + T0, a time Yes + Tf, a time Yes + lambda, a rate in reciprocal seconds Yes Note: Lambda is reported as packets per minute. Units: + T, a time, and Yes + dT, either a real number or an undefined number of seconds. Yes Report consists of series of measurements for Type-P-One-Way-Delay. RFC2679/Type-P-One-way-Delay-Median ----------------------------------- This value is being calculated and reported, for 15 minutes (or longer) intervals. 15 minutes came from user feedback. RFC2679/Type-P-One-way-Delay-Minimum ------------------------------------ Not implemented. We do, however, report the 2.5% and 97.5% of the distribution for 15 minutes (or longer) intervals. RFC2680/Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss ---------------------------------- Metric Parameters: Implemented + Src, the IP address of a host Yes + Dst, the IP address of a host Yes + T, a time Yes Metric Units: + Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss Yes Comments: + UDP packets are being used. + No special IP bits are set. + A packet is considered lost if it has not arrived after 255 seconds. There is no distinction between packets that do arrive but take longer than 255 seconds, or that never arrive at all. + The time is the time the packet was sent, rounded to the nearest full second. Further comments: This metric has been implemented in combination with RFC2679/Type-P-OWD. All comments made there apply. RFC2680/Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss-Poisson-Stream ------------------------------------------------- This has been implemented as part of RFC2679/Type-P-OWD-Poisson-Stream. Results consists of a series of measurements for the One Way Delay, with values of -1 for packets that were sent but did not arrive. RFC2680/Type-P-One-way-Packet-Loss-Average ------------------------------------------ This is being calculated for 15 minute (or longer) intervals. RFC2678 and 2681 ---------------- Have not been implemented due to a lack of demand from customers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Process and Procedure are the last hiding place of people without the wit and wisdom to do their job properly. (David Brent). _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
- [ippm] Call for implementation reports of RFC2678… Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
- Re: [ippm] Call for implementation reports of RFC… Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
- Re: [ippm] RIPE NCC's implementation report for R… Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)