Re: [ippm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02.txt

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Sat, 14 October 2017 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3CF12426E for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 12:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vzIbkuDMEh1h for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 12:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gozo.iway.ch (gozo.iway.ch [212.25.24.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0DF132C32 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 12:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gozo.iway.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856EC3406C1 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 21:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ACF/18338.7151); Sat, 14 Oct 2017 21:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from switchplus-mail.ch (switchplus-mail.ch [212.25.8.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gozo.iway.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 21:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [145.14.214.39] (account ietf@trammell.ch HELO [10.11.33.5]) by switchplus-mail.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.18) with ESMTPSA id 32758103 for ippm@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 21:43:34 +0200
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DF867966-ABA4-4690-9959-C3120EB0B5E1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 21:43:33 +0200
References: <150770786933.24703.16606761200521284544.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <aa9338c3-32fa-c484-533f-cc6a95606586@tuwien.ac.at>
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <aa9338c3-32fa-c484-533f-cc6a95606586@tuwien.ac.at>
Message-Id: <C2D7A297-D5B5-4EC7-90B4-A24A91FD6FC2@trammell.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/myFIj2_0_P0nCJ4sk8Dq6ymeLfc>
Subject: Re: [ippm] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 19:43:39 -0000

Greetings, all,

Let's go ahead and consider WGLC to have started for this draft with Joachim's message, then, to end at the IPPM meeting at IETF 100 in Singapore, on 01:00 UTC Monday 13 November. As Joachim says, please review and provide feedback to the WG at ippm@ietf.org.

Many thanks, best regards,

Brian (as IPPM co-chair)


> On 11 Oct 2017, at 10:18, Joachim Fabini <joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> Dear ippm, dear ippm chairs,
> 
> as agreed at the IETF meeting in Prague we have updated and submitted
> version 2 of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6. From the authors' perspective
> the document is now ready for starting wglc.
> 
> Summary of changes:
> The new version updates the title ("IPv6, IPv4 and Coexistence Updates
> for IPPM's Active Metric Framework") to reflect the enlarged draft
> scope. Main focus has been on the four topics/decisions that we
> presented at the Prague Meeting:
> 1. Fragement handling (no fragmentation allowed for v4 and for v6)
> 2. Header compression, 6LoWPAN: out of scope (requires substantial work
> in defining std-formed packet etc - should be discussed in own draft if
> needed).
> 3. Deprecated minimal std-formed packet for v4 and v6 (not used nor
> referenced)
> 4. IPv6 Extension Headers and measurements. The PDM options RFC is a
> first use case, in-situ OAM will follow. Even if there are controversal
> discussions on EH manipulation in intermediate nodes, these can
> beneficially support measurements.
> 
> Please review and provide feedback,
> 
> thanks and best regards
> Joachim
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02.txt
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:44:29 -0700
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: ippm-chairs@ietf.org, Michael S. Ackermann <mackermann@bcbsm.com>,
> Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>, Joachim Fabini
> <Joachim.Fabini@tuwien.ac.at>,  mackermann@bcbsm.com
> <mackermann@bcbsm.com>, Nalini Elkins
> <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>,
> Joachim Fabini <joachim.fabini@tuwien.ac.at>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Joachim Fabini and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6
> Revision:	02
> Title:		IPv6, IPv4 and Coexistence Updates for IPPM's Active Metric
> Framework
> Document date:	2017-10-10
> Group:		ippm
> Pages:		14
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02
> 
> Abstract:
>   This memo updates the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Framework RFC
>   2330 with new considerations for measurement methodology and testing.
>   It updates the definition of standard-formed packets in RFC 2330 to
>   include IPv6 packets, deprecates the definition of minimum standard-
>   formed packet, and augments distinguishing aspects of packets,
>   referred to as Type-P for test packets in RFC 2330.  This memo
>   identifies that IPv4-IPv6 co-existence can challenge measurements
>   within the scope of the IPPM Framework.  Exemplary use cases include,
>   but are not limited to IPv4-IPv6 translation, NAT, protocol
>   encapsulation, IPv6 header compression, or use of IPv6 over Low-Power
>   Wireless Area Networks (6LoWPAN).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm