Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5F5126CC4; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 03:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7zbl8ZLEbvVm; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 03:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B70131D32; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 03:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DLW23850; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:38:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:38:12 +0100
Received: from DGGEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.135]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:38:09 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org>
CC: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
Thread-Index: AQHTC5OWhf1LkHlOXUe+18aWC5YpTaJyaPvw
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:38:09 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE291852E7A@dggeml508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.194.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE291852E7Adggeml508mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.5982FD16.00B3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.135, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 55820853cbe4b19f7c209dd4b73ed96c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/nCb8-8WJrPPpt5F1yQ9A_30jo9M>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:38:19 -0000

Hi Carlos,

I'm not aware of any IPR other than those that have been disclosed applies to the document.

Best regards,
Mach

From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpignata@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 9:31 PM
To: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark

Dear IPPM,

This email starts an IPR call on draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06, in preparation to document advancement.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this draft-tempia-ippm-p3m:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2557/

_Action_:

If you are listed as a document author, editor, or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. These responses are needed for the shepherd questionnaire.

If you are on the IPPM WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

This poll will run for a week, or until all contributors respond.

Thanks!

—
Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com<mailto:carlos@cisco.com>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."