IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-06.txt

"Jeff W. Boote" <boote@internet2.edu> Wed, 26 March 2008 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ippm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ippm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ippm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBB63A6EDE; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uif2rSPhFDOW; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CE23A6F23; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA33D3A6DDE for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BjqhwbSqBiCF for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from basie.internet2.edu (basie.internet2.edu [207.75.164.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7FB3A6F21 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by basie.internet2.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEF747C98; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:28:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from basie.internet2.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (basie.internet2.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23149-07; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:28:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.16.56.18] (unknown [69.20.181.68]) by basie.internet2.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725D247BDC; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:28:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Jeff W. Boote" <boote@internet2.edu>
To: Murtaza Chiba <mchiba@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D492339CC466C84EA5E0AF1CECB200810561CCB4@xmb-sjc-21b.amer.cisco.com>
References: <47C2C60C.9070807@ripe.net> <47DE8A2D.40409@ripe.net> <D492339CC466C84EA5E0AF1CECB200810561CCB4@xmb-sjc-21b.amer.cisco.com>
Message-Id: <F969C95F-E509-4997-BD15-2AB84C785835@internet2.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:28:12 -0600
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
X-Virus-Scanned: by mail.internet2.edu virus scanner
Cc: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-06.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ippm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org

On Mar 25, 2008, at 2:09 PM, Murtaza Chiba (mchiba) wrote:
>
> Q3) Is it possible to add a SID to a Start-Sessions message?   That
> would help limit the meaning of Active to be per SID allowing for
> different SIDs to be started and stopped on demand.   Sometimes one  
> may
> want to start a Test Stream in response to an observed network
> behaviour.

I believe it is more simple to just open another control-connection in  
this case. That was the solution we decided upon  in OWAMP anyway.

I can see other use cases where it would be advantageous to do as you  
suggest. It probably comes down to determining what the most likely  
use cases are and optimizing based on that. But, I figured I would let  
you know the motivation for why we did it this way in OWAMP. (In fact,  
at the time I suggested something like what you have suggested here.  
In the end, during implementation, I was glad to have it stay more  
simple.)

jeff
--
Jeff W. Boote
boote@internet2.edu




_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email