Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 04 December 2019 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA92B12088B; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:50:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljjE7rkol0iq; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:50:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702131209A8; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id w15so260227wru.4; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:50:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uli4jW1go9hGgcs7oR1jbr1aK4Ynoj4fHhmFEoC2zTA=; b=lIoGurCVYQtXkXjc2JwYQwlWTdu7fQycPUsr6b+h2f/VG7r6nsUBrtwJMbPqW4j0ue 8KxUAWB4CCClZkOENOa2TWBA9yvfoE25zQnQXKsTVdRnu71f8b5O9fuhlUJiUlW2n6PE nFMMWKiqVOzurbJZyT8At5t03LVwmhRpX7xhwvvok2x0C0m2j+TApUMZQnED3nznHiPq fY83B2Q69WjjODWaBk9jnrbarlb2AiWdUXhn6byw9NCbIgTdwARF3fNfV4FhBoMkGc08 lIPIT4lJ4MYcKfH8QFhrqNO/Ob1QLng4k62jS/CCjJWAP1nG2XQucnkapl7m84HkGuT6 FQEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uli4jW1go9hGgcs7oR1jbr1aK4Ynoj4fHhmFEoC2zTA=; b=PPEAvIL7ubVclXoC4tgXfd9+sWLBOkXSxSqBbPszc6dg5PlClBWQ8b9550xLcTARwS IorszK2pcLa7AahB/ZYKUbkmZdPJh+C68zu0NProiEeW77LDYsXUugHYmyM8iZ7T2YSQ pJTtkfwyhJsTqFsgNEXOaqt7VwPIsfK1AZKeKbQvAcu20RujdhqGcv8ZcaWE5kEPk39T IEf8lqomzPW9WqNqfoT9gI2c737iYIgeCWou13lSsiIm3kUwncLceH9zqVYneIFLUafa IZJxX3Tf5XKIgkyXc+l0DUTHOPnKVMKSjWX+v29oqmlFdmTD6gI7dcE+F3uqAY3TZkai COkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWrEaw0CppAS3mVBgVXU8OLKNyYhwy2BL5BcXyuxgzunqeiZkX8 cUOf/Br+dQiTPSbuQIOlM8NUcb55ihZldVPflXo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhZVjLVinRnMZrxHEwpAABedp1rXgpfUw/Iv5xTixYtc4enkq1cqr7BDu02rrFFnUk0nCbDi88wkELtrixwWI=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9427:: with SMTP id 36mr5491116wrq.166.1575481828902; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:50:27 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <248D5A0E-3471-4C1D-8D31-7BF7244AFC7E@kuehlewind.net>
References: <157541264931.4734.14501743204777647352.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CFA6F05456@njmtexg5.research.att.com> <CAMMESsxeQJGwPW4TjXzQ_bzQKfAmv2taVorpJh2DE4QfRj9ZGQ@mail.gmail.com> <248D5A0E-3471-4C1D-8D31-7BF7244AFC7E@kuehlewind.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 09:50:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESszq+dno3W+B-rDGJ3gi23hbGfh7XJWwPVSCN500UWjZFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "ietf@wjcerveny.com" <ietf@wjcerveny.com>, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/nlwlB5CbXh88QbU24KttH4d_WvI>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:50:37 -0000

On December 4, 2019 at 11:51:42 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:

Mirja:

Hi!

> I just added this afternoon a management item to approve the experts for this
> registry and both experts are authors of draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry, so
> I assume we can be sure that they did a review :-) I would think we don’t
> need any additional process/separate management item here. But we can also do
> that if that’s better for you…?

Approving the experts is fine with me -- then it is up to IANA how the
initial entries are approved.

Thanks!

Alvaro.