[ippm] AD Review: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl-03

[Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>]

Summary: Almost ready. Issues below are straightforward to address - either revise the document or provide me with an RFC Editor Note.

Section 1., paragraph 4:
>    Implementers of this feature may also wish to implement the "Reflect
>    Octets" feature, described in [I-D.ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets].

  Suggest to add something like "once the RFC has been published."


Section 1., paragraph 6:
>    This memo is intended to be an update to the TWAMP RFC.

  Then you need an "Updates: 5357" header in the boilerplate. It would
  also be good to clarify in the text that that means that this
  extensions becomes mandatory to implement for all TWMP implementations
  (i.e., it is non-optional.) Oh, and add a reference to RFC5357 to this
  statement.


Section 3.7., paragraph 2:
>    If this feature is adopted, the last ???? bits of the Modes 32-bit

  Do you mean "used" instead of "adopted"? Also, ???? needs to be
  clarified.


Section 8.2., paragraph 2:
>    [x]        "".

  Remove.