[ippm] Document Action: 'Precision Availability Metrics for Services Governed by Service Level Objectives (SLOs)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-ippm-pam-09.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Fri, 01 December 2023 20:05 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ippm-pam@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, tpauly@apple.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <170146110158.35318.1728745284649871940@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 12:05:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/oQnPHsTVy0mvWqTBgexYV3XbNfo>
Subject: [ippm] Document Action: 'Precision Availability Metrics for Services Governed by Service Level Objectives (SLOs)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-ippm-pam-09.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Precision Availability Metrics for Services Governed by Service Level
   Objectives (SLOs)'
  (draft-ietf-ippm-pam-09.txt) as Informational RFC

This document is the product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Zaheduzzaman Sarker and Martin Duke.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-pam/




Technical Summary

   This document defines a set of metrics for networking services with
   performance requirements expressed as Service Level Objectives (SLO).
   These metrics, referred to as Precision Availability Metrics (PAM),
   are useful for defining and monitoring SLOs.  For example, PAM can be
   used by providers and/or customers of an IETF Network Slice Service
   to assess whether the service is provided in compliance with its
   defined SLOs.

Working Group Summary

This document got good review across the WG, with positive input from WG
members who work in various areas. I believe that this had around the normal
amount of engagement for IPPM, and we reached good consensus on the document.

Document Quality

We believe there is one implementation that uses the concepts in this informational draft, but it is not confirmed.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Tommy Pauly. The Responsible
   Area Director is Martin Duke.

[ippm] Document Action: 'Precision Availability M… The IESG