[ippm] About path congestion metric, welcome to discuss
Dangjuanna <dangjuanna@huawei.com> Mon, 04 March 2019 09:38 UTC
Return-Path: <dangjuanna@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEEA13103F for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 01:38:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WrP7se2-_oCf for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 01:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A023412941A for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 01:38:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3337CF18B555A92AA748 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:38:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:38:36 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:38:26 +0800
From: Dangjuanna <dangjuanna@huawei.com>
To: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: About path congestion metric, welcome to discuss
Thread-Index: AdTSbRgw7vu0UTo0RZ2toNYCa3Eg6w==
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:38:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D3E4F603943C4046A08B2F4037A66BB7C667752C@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.176.239]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3E4F603943C4046A08B2F4037A66BB7C667752CNKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/q_vS044Qw0dv4RfliSx_6Soo-xw>
Subject: [ippm] About path congestion metric, welcome to discuss
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:38:42 -0000
Hi everyone, I have submit a new individual draft named A One-Path Congestion Metric for IPPM. Welcome to discuss. Best wishes, Joanna Dang =============================================== A new version of I-D, draft-dang-ippm-congestion-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Joanna Dang and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-dang-ippm-congestion Revision: 00 Title: A One-Path Congestion Metric for IPPM Document date: 2019-03-04 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 10 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dang-ippm-congestion-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dang-ippm-congestion/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dang-ippm-congestion-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dang-ippm-congestion Abstract: This memo defines a metric for one path congestion across Internet paths. The traditional mode evaluates network congestion based on the bandwidth utilization of the link. However, there is a lack of E2E path congestion that is truly service oriented. So A Path Congestion Metric is required. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat