[ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (6409)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 25 January 2021 08:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40813A0C81 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:12:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C485Fj23PVwD for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:12:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE843A0C77 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:12:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7A849F4074C; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:12:18 -0800 (PST)
To: acmorton@att.com, lencia@att.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, ianswett@google.com, tpauly@apple.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org, ippm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210125081218.7A849F4074C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:12:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/s9R0kvGjUkUullFBdFY-f2R6rbI>
Subject: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (6409)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:12:21 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6038, "Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6409 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org> Section: 4.2 Original Text ------------- The Padding Length SHOULD be >= 56 octets when specifying a test session using the Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes to allow for the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. The Padding Length SHALL be > the Length of padding to reflect when specifying a test session using the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode. In Unauthenticated TWAMP-Test mode, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 27 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. In Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 56 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. Corrected Text -------------- The Padding Length SHOULD be >= 64 octets when specifying a test session using the Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes to allow for the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. The Padding Length SHALL be > the Length of padding to reflect when specifying a test session using the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode. In Unauthenticated TWAMP-Test mode, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 27 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. In Authenticated or Encrypted TWAMP-Test modes, the Padding Length SHALL be >= 64 + Length of padding to reflect octets when specifying a test session using both the OPTIONAL Reflect Octets mode and the truncation process that TWAMP recommends, see Section 4.2.1 of [RFC5357]. Notes ----- Invalid required padding size (56 instead of 64) for modes with authentication and encryption. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features Publication Date : October 2010 Author(s) : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Measurement Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6038 (6409) RFC Errata System