Re: [ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.txt

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Tue, 27 June 2023 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DC0C15155B for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7dJYa-F1BX7 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EF0C15153F for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QqmT31f7Mz67H66 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:54:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 01:57:32 +0100
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:57:30 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.027; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:57:30 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHZqGy26hZST+0Vv0aNk6GJ2AN/UK+d01Cg
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:57:30 +0000
Message-ID: <8a0c78fff96843af93cdac5c2c42e5d4@huawei.com>
References: <168781045941.57145.13085166230362026738@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmXbT=kWFRVWV278ndjdaLuz8WcezM3ed_HjumaKxML79A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmXbT=kWFRVWV278ndjdaLuz8WcezM3ed_HjumaKxML79A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.41.58]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8a0c78fff96843af93cdac5c2c42e5d4huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/vPGS5qX3ay8TYxrh3yMsNt87vBw>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:57:40 -0000

Hi Greg,

STAMP is to standardize TWAMP light.
If you want to extend the control msg, why not to use TWAMP?

Best,
Tianran

From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Greg Mirsky
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 4:26 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.txt

Dear All,
a new draft describes an extension of STAMP, Reflected Test Packet Control TLV, that adds some interesting behaviors, including the ability for a Session-Sender to control test packet reflection by the Session-Reflector. Among the controllable parameters are the length of the reflected packet, the number of reflected packets transmitted in response to the received STAMP test packet, and the time interval between those reflected packets. One of the behaviors that can be achieved by using Reflected Test Packet Control TLV is selective suppression of Session-Reflector transmitting a reflected packet.

I greatly appreciate your comments, questions, and suggestions, and I welcome cooperation.

Regards,
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
Date: Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 1:14 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.txt
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>>



A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts
Revision:       00
Title:          Performance Measurement with Asymmetrical Packets in STAMP
Document date:  2023-06-26
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          6
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts/
Html:           https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-00.html
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts


Abstract:
   This document describes an optional extension to a Simple Two-way
   Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) that enables the use of STAMP
   test and reflected packets of variable length during a single STAMP
   test session.  In some use cases, the use of asymmetrical test
   packets allow for the creation of more realistic flows of test
   packets and, thus, a closer approximation between active performance
   measurements and conditions experienced by the monitored application.




The IETF Secretariat