[ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to the Working Group for tackling the issue of the author count.  I
know those conversations can be quite un-fun.

I concur with John that the references to RFCs 7014 and 5475 should be
informative.

Section 6 should indicate explicitly that this document is the reference
document for the two new registry entries.  I realize that may be obvious, but
you need to say it.