IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Adoption Call for draft-ioamteam-ippm-ioam-direct-export

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Tue, 03 December 2019 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694FE1201B7 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 00:48:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBHaV9FOGvoM for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 00:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07B61201AA for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 00:48:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8689B3A93A9D96BDF2C3; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:48:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM422-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.39) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 08:48:01 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.24]) by dggemm422-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 16:47:54 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption Call for draft-ioamteam-ippm-ioam-direct-export
Thread-Index: AQHVncLDHpeClftEkEWwiGGHORm+4qeoL61A
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:47:55 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD27D24093@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <DD86711B-AE31-4088-8F04-AC00DB694D7D@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <DD86711B-AE31-4088-8F04-AC00DB694D7D@trammell.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/yQkIAXIFe1DLnf81skgbGBtVW0k>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption Call for draft-ioamteam-ippm-ioam-direct-export
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:48:05 -0000

Hi,
I support the adoption of this draft.

I have one comment, the IANA section specify a registry for the IOAM DEX Flags. There are no initial values yet the draft mentions in the consideration section the loopback flag so is loopback supported by this draft?
What about the overflow flag?

Roni Even 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Trammell
> (IETF)
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 5:46 AM
> To: IETF IPPM WG
> Subject: [ippm] Adoption Call for draft-ioamteam-ippm-ioam-direct-export
> 
> Greetings, all,
> 
> The IPPM working group has been asked to adopt draft-ioamteam-ippm-
> ioam-direct-export-00 as as a working group document.
> 
> This message begins an adoption call to end on Monday 9 December 2019.
> Please send a message to ippm@ietf.org indicating:
> 
> - whether you believe the draft is in scope for the WG and mature enough to
> be a WG document, and if not, why not
> - whether you are willing to review the document
> 
> Many thanks, cheers,
> 
> Brian (as co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email