[ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-16 ietf last call Perfmetrdir review
Xiao Min via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 14 October 2026 07:39 UTC
Received: by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) id 6065046; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:39:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ietf.org; s=mail; t=1791963575; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BstGXaJV2m6Gc1N0iSJyw+T5KW79Yga+9nkbgyxM50c=; b=PELeLUmzph4D5E9w0IebTH9KqzvQCUQ+Uifdl8H4fjpgGupSndE5AiIbUeWaA6USjv+hR3 OT85aE0G6VGHsqAbn3KPbRH7NqTTXGUyLVPGkP6iIfBit4eznOvIvgPS6HYmzXbhruWqt3 uuCnop6h8TUbDTqqLil2u2T5lqjizPg=
Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=mail2@ietf.org smtp.mailfrom=noreply@ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.22] (gaia.k8s.ietf.org [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD1A13A94FBB; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Xiao Min via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <179196357493.402365.4461945560739950751@dt-datatracker-66f49ddcbd-klxkm>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:39:34 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: A6GIKA765BQAXA5VH5KBL5V5CFNSE2E3
X-Message-ID-Hash: A6GIKA765BQAXA5VH5KBL5V5CFNSE2E3
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.all@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Reply-To: Xiao Min <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
Subject: [ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-16 ietf last call Perfmetrdir review
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/yQuPdrouWNXRFygdAF_k3cGhoRU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr Title: Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) Extensions for Reflecting STAMP Packet IP Headers Reviewer: Xiao Min Review result: Has Nits Hi, I have been selected as the Performance Metrics Directorate (perfmetrdir) reviewer for this Internet-Draft. The Performance Metrics Directorate assists the OPS Area Directors, Chairs, and ADs, to review performance-related documents. This is an IETF Last Call review requested by the AD. The Performance Metrics Directorate will be applying the Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development, RFC 6390. - Document: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-16 - Reviewer: Xiao Min - Review Date: Oct 14, 2026 - Intended Status: Standards Track --- ## Summary I've reviewed the latest version 16 of this draft. The minor concerns I raised during my PERFMETRDIR Early review on version 08 have been addressed or clarified. Two more nits found on version 16. ## Nits Section 4.2, Figure 3, there is a note saying "Value of M <= N", however I couldn't find N within this figure, and I suspect *Header-2* should read *Header-N*. Section 3.1, s/headers specified in this section is applicable/headers specified in this section are applicable.
- [ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-16 ietf last… Xiao Min via Datatracker
- [ippm] Re: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-16 ietf … Rakesh Gandhi
- [ippm] Re: draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr-16 ietf … xiao.min2