Re: [ippm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-00.txt
Jerome Benoit <jerome.benoit@grenouille.com> Tue, 06 July 2010 12:19 UTC
Return-Path: <jerome.benoit@grenouille.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB1E3A67A1 for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.865
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.865 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-i3fVP8he4n for <ippm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from laposte.grenouille.com (ns37873.ovh.net [91.121.8.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93873A684A for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by laposte.grenouille.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477217F198 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:19:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: spam & virus filtering at laposte.grenouille.com
Received: from laposte.grenouille.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns37873.ovh.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GP9RWZrfOmJF for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:19:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nemesis.grenouille.com (bea13-2-82-239-143-199.fbx.proxad.net [82.239.143.199]) by laposte.grenouille.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D487F113 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:19:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nemesis.grenouille.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C603B62027 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:19:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:19:33 +0200
From: Jerome Benoit <jerome.benoit@grenouille.com>
To: ippm@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20100706141933.c765da1b.jerome.benoit@grenouille.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100705074502.DF8063A6967@core3.amsl.com>
References: <20100705074502.DF8063A6967@core3.amsl.com>
Organization: grenouille.com
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__6_Jul_2010_14_19_33_+0200_HOF14ZRp955R3tJG"
Subject: Re: [ippm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:19:37 -0000
Le Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:45:02 -0700 (PDT), Internet-Drafts@ietf.org a écrit : > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-00.txt Do you plan do add inaccuracy introduced by runtime on each implementation ? Do you plan to you plan to test implementation that will not follow IETF OWAMP (or TWAMP) RFC but will largely inspired by them (NAT friendliness of theses RFC make them difficult to follow when you want to send probes from the network edge et behind a CPE) ? Regards, -- Jérôme Benoit aka fraggle La Météo du Net - http://grenouille.com OpenPGP Key ID : 9FE9161D Key fingerprint : 9CA4 0249 AF57 A35B 34B3 AC15 FAA0 CB50 9FE9 161D
- [ippm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-00.t… Internet-Drafts
- Re: [ippm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-… Jerome Benoit
- Re: [ippm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-… Al Morton
- Re: [ippm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-… Jerome Benoit