IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-11: (with COMMENT)

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775C312777C; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mkz1E7wHiA-t; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x242.google.com (mail-pl0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E049130F9F; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x242.google.com with SMTP id a7-v6so263019plp.3; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QoJkHpgBZz624/Trk0rsKo5zWDTE5kwhy5BgD+yRq94=; b=K3yMrZz+Vhs9L4F0W//6j9JSNEgYSGQj0WJZM+NcUYkP8bHh5Dxkd9S+YD9B6fR24T /UYom/Z+29HDZS+3N70susINgcxmYru0q3LKqVi9KHsgnBVtmEaLjic/lXCy+bibIY9M k5oz5djaRoxL/BHWnRZX8aCrObbQwMGoLaDxYx/8ksHSA5FWnwfdwnwc2l8ocxzT0tPR UyqolzmfYm7H/mDXD7vjXcetZ/pS2cnfXIoTz1/XJsmRH7UUJNxtuEpKLgviOzpmcNjJ Hh9pcMCzDVAUbvlvOYhCP4ZHUG5IEPlk3yOIntfmRF73661UadxbLMSMuvRXBCMUGt0f QuIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QoJkHpgBZz624/Trk0rsKo5zWDTE5kwhy5BgD+yRq94=; b=IvE/N1P5VEX1DJrXXd+b02pmrgrwc4B1GqBaVvO8hrGIJrwO+jUNBZ54UzZOXOPQU4 uAnMVZKNvxa2iWBf7UOctbiZ8ZYdROevAHFlC2xxOSSEZWIWgsLm3c25olugznCY5ihI lMaIEOwA8bmCUyhp2n2KVdK/S6f/eO2EeDni99U2baMWsOK2DU7yaAWEdEjafZx4oO7U vYzIV8anhBBbL/H2/o7WJog0biogKBJHT02XH/Hstl4rQPdGMk0/DNa8qdNY22545cny 961RdcRwVRBamMlgeoDBFBsnTEbz2xMTScPJvvmsOkSDI5EvGe1Vr2YgeHg1qNTLov9s /ZJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0nRwjBFJO0oF8I7dq4I7Yyeju9F8DjnGq2lkvFgL4cfRByidkk NH427aa3FyJ1oGB1tLKVsB9DmywpdVg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKDTq9v2UwTOhlv8TIJtn6nWUk9egmdIQ6cky5cYmcSOZRmP7tYTtwNR+tQdATJB9ZcW65mCw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8210:: with SMTP id x16-v6mr4349354pln.307.1529520589039; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4700:1280:b1be:15a3:4c29:e792? ([2601:647:4700:1280:b1be:15a3:4c29:e792]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g12-v6sm4434817pfh.164.2018.06.20.11.49.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <152948741624.11831.6942344673743649925.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:49:46 -0700
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang@ietf.org, Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <71E77DBC-AD89-4DD3-A9DC-1C43325A975B@gmail.com>
References: <152948741624.11831.6942344673743649925.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/zcDnIqm5_ejDRCmknwDOisArf5E>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:49:52 -0000

Hi Suresh,

> On Jun 20, 2018, at 2:36 AM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-11: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> It would be good if the yang model can be updated to refer to the NTPv4
> specification (RFC5905) for the timestamps. It is currently referring to the
> obsolete NTPv3 specification (RFC1305 which is not listed in the references
> section) to describe the timestamp format.
> 

Will update the reference to NTP in the YANG model to NTPv4. The draft has the updated reference to NTPv4 as you suggest.

Thanks.

> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email