Re: Transfers of copyright versus licensing

Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com> Mon, 14 March 2005 16:15 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA19037 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:15:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DAsHM-0000du-G6 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:18:52 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DAsC1-0003CL-9x; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:13:21 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DAsBz-00037a-Rx for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:13:19 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA18858 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:13:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nwkea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.42.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DAsFe-0000XE-9g for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:17:06 -0500
Received: from eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM ([129.148.13.40]) by nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2EGDGNV002183; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:13:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thunk (thunk.East.Sun.COM [129.148.174.66]) by eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id j2EGDGOp013490; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:13:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from thunk.east.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thunk (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2EGDGP0027382; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:13:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from sommerfeld@localhost) by thunk.east.sun.com (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3/Submit) id j2EGDF7w027381; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:13:15 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: thunk.east.sun.com: sommerfeld set sender to sommerfeld@sun.com using -f
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4232076F.4070307@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <744054F86C2018BDEF80D603@as-s2n.ietf62.ietf.org> <1110490891.10971.208.camel@unknown.hamachi.org> <4232076F.4070307@zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1110816795.27077.20.camel@thunk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.325
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:13:15 -0500
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Transfers of copyright versus licensing
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 16:02, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> > I've seen indications (in the context of an open source project) that
> > joint copyright ownership might be legally possible.
> > 
> > In other words, both the contributor *and* the recipient would retain full
> > rights to do whatever they wanted with the text.
> 
> Scenario: I write a spec. The IETF puts the ISOC copyright on it.
> I invert a couple of bytes in my version and republish.
> Interoperability, anybody?

ok, now I'm confused; how is this any different from the universe 
described in John Klensin's note:

   The IETF's traditional approach toward documents, even 
   standards-track ones, has been to leave copyright ownership in 
   the hands of the original authors and editors but to demand, for 
   the IETF and ISOC, such rights as we believe are required to get 
   our work done.

i.e.., in the universe as described by Klensin, the original author is 
already able to fork the protocol.

I agree with you that forking of protocols is something which should be
discouraged.

						- Bill


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg