IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: recourse if our rules are violated?

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Fri, 13 April 2007 18:21 UTC

Return-path: <ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcQOL-0006dE-C5; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:21:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcQOJ-0006d4-Gr for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:20:59 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcQOI-0007Ns-6E for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:20:59 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HcQOC-0004H9-Tk for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:20:52 +0200
Received: from d254059.dialin.hansenet.de ([80.171.254.59]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:20:52 +0200
Received: from nobody by d254059.dialin.hansenet.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:20:52 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ipr-wg@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:18:27 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <461FC973.3893@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <20070409232745.B92DA2D2D51@newdev.harvard.edu> <461B3D2B.2090700@zurich.ibm.com> <81A69CD8ECD4C8A03A85AFB5@p3.JCK.COM> <461B90DA.50000@zurich.ibm.com> <6F070598C92B8EAAA3E5CC0F@p3.JCK.COM> <461BD230.57E0@xyzzy.claranet.de> <084BF23A88A607B2209378A3@[192.168.1.108]> <461CEFFA.3E86@xyzzy.claranet.de> <461DE625.5000604@zurich.ibm.com><461DFBF7.8080404@cisco.com> <461E3A15.304A@xyzzy.claranet.de> <461E4A6F.7060206@zurich.ibm.com> <006101c77de8$2fb7ae40$0601a8c0@pc6>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: d254059.dialin.hansenet.de
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Subject: Re: recourse if our rules are violated?
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org

Tom Petch wrote:

> (I first saw it in RFC3710:-).

February 2004.  I first saw it three months later in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-atkinson-callerid-00

It was introduced in RFC 3668 (obsoleted by RFC 3979,
updated by RFC 4879).

> So what did whoever introduced that text intend to happen?

My guess was that I should send a mail to iprATietf.org
when I feel that the bloodshed hits the fan.  A first
party IPR claim was published less than three weeks
after my complaint.  I've no idea what happened in any
backchambers before, at, or after that time, excluding
some stuff visible in the MARID jabber logs.

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email