IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 13 August 2013 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E9E11E8199 for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zh-dT8fxvgUd for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E316D11E8150 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc-vpn5-2.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.234]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28EC44010C; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:26:28 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <520A6B91.4020705@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:23:29 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
Subject: Re: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing
References: <CE2FB515.A0AF8%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CE2FB515.A0AF8%stewe@stewe.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "ipr-wg@ietf.org" <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:23:40 -0000

On 8/13/13 11:05 AM, Stephan Wenger wrote:
> Barry,
> Your formulation is certainly more accessible.  I'm fine with it.

Agreed.

Formatting aside, is that hierarchy of options complete and accurate? It
looks fine to me and consistent with our "running code" in these
matters. I wonder: do we need to specify a bit more what we mean by
"open-source-friendly non-assert terms"?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email