Comments on IPR drafts
Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 31 July 2003 17:27 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05048 for <ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iHCk-00044i-AU for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:06 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6VHR6qV015660 for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:06 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iHCk-00044V-6T for ipr-wg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:06 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05025 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iHCi-0005qO-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:04 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iHCh-0005qK-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:03 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iHCf-00043r-8L; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:27:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19iHCY-00043g-JT for ipr-wg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:26:54 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05008 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:26:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iHCW-0005qH-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:26:52 -0400
Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19iHCV-0005q5-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:26:51 -0400
Received: from westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.193.32]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.9/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h6VHQFj3204656 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:26:15 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.193.82]) by westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.9/NCO/VER6.5) with ESMTP id h6VHQEc1084134 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:26:14 -0600
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h6VHOJ6l002092 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:24:19 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (narten@localhost) by rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h6VHOJsS002088 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:24:19 -0400
Message-Id: <200307311724.h6VHOJsS002088@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Comments on IPR drafts
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:24:19 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Sender: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Hi.
I've just completed a detailed review of:
draft-ietf-ipr-submission-rights-06.txt
draft-ietf-ipr-technology-rights-10.txt
draft-ietf-ipr-template-05.txt
Specific comments will come as separate messages. I've tried to split
the comments into substantive vs. editorial, but erred on the side
of marking things substantive mainly to be sure I understand the
intent.
None of my comments are intended to be substantive changes to the
actual policies at issue, rather, they relate to portions of the
document I find unclear, potentially ambiguous, or not addressing an
issue that I've seen come up in IPR-related discussions over the
years.
Note: I have not been following the WG discussions in detail, so my
comments really come from reading the words in the documents without
the context of WG discussion.
Apologies for the length and detail. But this is an important topic
where the details are important.
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
- Comments on IPR drafts Thomas Narten