Re: "implementor" wording in draft-ietf-ipr-template-05.txt
Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Fri, 08 August 2003 18:24 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19973 for <ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:24:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19lBuG-0000TL-KD for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:24:04 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h78IO4Lm001752 for ipr-wg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:24:04 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19lBuF-0000SB-3d for ipr-wg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:24:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19953 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:23:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19lBuC-0002cM-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:24:00 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19lBuB-0002cI-00 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:23:59 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19lBuD-0000Qn-7e; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:24:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19lBtT-0000QE-8E for ipr-wg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:23:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19919 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:23:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19lBtQ-0002bj-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:23:12 -0400
Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19lBtP-0002bd-00 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:23:11 -0400
Received: from northrelay04.pok.ibm.com (northrelay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.206]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.9/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h78IMfPS109056 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:22:41 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by northrelay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.9/NCO/VER6.5) with ESMTP id h78IMdnW141972 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:22:40 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h78IMd6l012491 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:22:39 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (narten@localhost) by rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h78IMdsH012486 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:22:39 -0400
Message-Id: <200308081822.h78IMdsH012486@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
to: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: "implementor" wording in draft-ietf-ipr-template-05.txt
In-Reply-To: Message from narten@us.ibm.com of "Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:31:52 EDT." <200308012131.h71LVqOv012823@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:22:39 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Sender: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Responding to Scott under this subject: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu> writes: > as far as defining the term in the template - the most I would suggest > to to have a place for the person filling out the teplate to > say who the free license covers - I see no reason that we should > restrict or define what the IPR discloser wants to say about > who can implement their technology for what type of license The above would work for me too (but why restrict to only "free license"?). What I want to be clear about is, that if someone fills out a template, there is no misunderstanding about who is covered or needs to be aware. To me, "implementor", without any definition, seems vague, especially given the much more explicit definition p. , in the technology-rights document. Thomas _______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
- "implementor" wording in draft-ietf-ipr-template-… Thomas Narten
- Re: "implementor" wording in draft-ietf-ipr-templ… Thomas Narten