Re: Copying conditions

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> Sat, 08 January 2005 00:00 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA09437 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:00:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cn4Ex-0007Zj-Ax for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:13:59 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cn3yH-0000gm-5x; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:56:45 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cn3wS-0000BL-8p for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:54:52 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08990 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:54:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net ([217.13.230.178] helo=yxa.extundo.com ident=root) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cn49Q-00073V-BY for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:08:20 -0500
Received: from latte.josefsson.org (c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se [217.215.27.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j07Nsb3F032322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:54:38 +0100
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <tslpt1ixy9g.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <021e01c4df24$4464f420$3201a8c0@Rosenlaw> <ilubrcxd6hu.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <686CB9A5B1F96660BB6BAE94@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <ilu7jmtf1uy.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <543559EDF44094DDBC127655@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <iluhdlu7hb2.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <p0620070abe04c6734410@[10.20.30.249]>
OpenPGP: id=0xB565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:23:050107:ipr-wg@ietf.org::YjoTq/iEPafNGCMM:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000032KH
X-Hashcash: 1:23:050107:harald@alvestrand.no::8TkpZ/aYb+qiSn+d:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000EF02
X-Hashcash: 1:23:050107:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org::trUtzKOBvFg/qdPY:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000I1Sr
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:54:32 +0100
In-Reply-To: <p0620070abe04c6734410@[10.20.30.249]> (Paul Hoffman's message of "Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:12:41 -0800")
Message-ID: <iluvfa8ztfr.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on yxa-iv
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/618/Mon Dec 6 00:09:24 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on yxa.extundo.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Copying conditions
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f4c2cf0bccc868e4cc88dace71fb3f44

Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> writes:

> At 3:39 PM +0100 1/6/05, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>See Appendix B:
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-josefsson-rfc2538bis-01.txt
>
> <bold>IANAL</bold>, but I doubt that putting two conflicting 
> copyright statements in one document makes any sense legally.

A work may be owned by more than one person?

Generally, I don't understand how ISOC can claim copyright of my work.
I didn't sign any papers agreeing to transfer the copyright.

Is copyright transfer by anything but real signatures legally binding?

Perhaps it is based on the good will, that authors won't challenge
that ISOC own the copyright.

It appears as if moral rights cannot be negotiated away fully [1],
though, so presumably I could object to ISOC's publication of my work.

> Instead, would this be better for your document?

Perhaps if it was altered to only apply to the part of the document
that I wrote.  It is a -bis document, so I didn't write most of it.

Btw, perhaps the original authors should still be mentioned in the
header, even if they did not participate in the -bis document effort?

There is another document:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-josefsson-openpgp-mailnews-header-00.txt

The authors wrote the entire document, and agreed to the stated
permissive copying conditions.  I believe these two documents
illustrate two different cases, both relevant.

Harald Alvestrand clarified that putting the copying condition in a
document was not the final solution, so I'm not sure I understand why
we are improving the text.  If I read Harald correct this time,
putting the copying condition in a submitted document was a first
step, that would allow the IETF to discuss this matter.  I didn't
think the discussion would be about what text I use.  Rather, I
thought it would be about how similar rights can be granted for all
IETF documents.  Feel free to correct me again.

Thanks,
Simon

[1] Article 6bis of
http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/trtdocs_wo001.html#P123_20726

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg