IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Last Call on draft-narten-ipr-3979-3rd-party-fix-00.txt

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Fri, 27 October 2006 12:15 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdQcD-0008QU-8P; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:15:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdQc9-0008N2-4E for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:15:09 -0400
Received: from machshav.com ([147.28.0.16]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdQUw-00017e-9q for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:07:46 -0400
Received: by machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 512) id 9FA75FB2B0; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:07:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berkshire.machshav.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EACFB2AB; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:07:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by berkshire.machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 54047) id 4F5403C083B; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:07:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:07:31 -0400
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Message-Id: <20061027080731.24fcda9b.smb@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610270930360.17467@netcore.fi>
References: <20061026173013.1d94d743.smb@cs.columbia.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610270930360.17467@netcore.fi>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386--netbsdelf)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Last Call on draft-narten-ipr-3979-3rd-party-fix-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:33:52 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola
<pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> > Per my note of two weeks ago, this is a formal WG Last Call on
> > draft-narten-ipr-3979-3rd-party-fix-00.txt.  Given the nature of the
> > document, I'm making this a one-week Last Call.
> 
> It seems OK.
> 
> However, I wonder about the process.  Do we really need to publish 
> every single small fix as an RFC (a BCP at that)?  Shouldn't there be 
> a better way to handle this, given that 3979 revision is already under 
> way (e.g., go as far as the IESG approval of the document, but never 
> actually publish it)?  But this is off-topic for this list...
> 
Revising 3979 -- or rather, gearing up to do so -- is on our agenda for
San Diego.  But how long will that take to do, and do properly?


		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email