IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-narten-ipr-3979-3rd-party-fix-00.txt

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Sat, 21 October 2006 00:05 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb4N2-0000Sn-4i; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:05:48 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb4N0-0000GM-HH for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:05:46 -0400
Received: from machshav.com ([147.28.0.16]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb4My-0005CD-8n for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:05:46 -0400
Received: by machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 512) id 9AAF0FB2B5; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:05:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from berkshire.machshav.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE67FB2AF; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by berkshire.machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 54047) id 331E63C06F6; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:05:37 -0400
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>
Message-Id: <20061020200537.ea60a576.smb@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <00b601c6f48b$e0db7cb0$010aa8c0@home.glassey.com>
References: <20061013223040.91f75eb1.smb@cs.columbia.edu> <45306A5D.BFA@xyzzy.claranet.de> <00b601c6f48b$e0db7cb0$010aa8c0@home.glassey.com>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386--netbsdelf)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-narten-ipr-3979-3rd-party-fix-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:08:14 -0700, "todd glassey"
<tglassey@earthlink.net> wrote:

> BCP78 and BCP79 cannot be fractioned into more documents - that is insane -
> The scope of these documents is a contract that is nearly impossible to
> manage and that is really a bad idea in my opinion.
> 

We all agree.  One of the agenda items for San Diego -- I'll get the
agenda posted this weekend -- is to revise milestones for the WG; the main
item for that is to produce a clean revision of RFC 3978, as we've long
promised we would.

Given the history of this group, that won't happen as quickly as I'd
like.  Until then, we need bug fixes.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email