IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on minutes

sob@harvard.edu (Scott Bradner) Tue, 18 April 2006 18:27 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVuvL-0000rQ-Ru; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:27:39 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVuvK-0000rL-OQ for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:27:38 -0400
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212] helo=newdev.harvard.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVuvJ-0007Lr-IL for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:27:38 -0400
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3A09771D640; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:27:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: ipr-wg@ietf.org, jas@extundo.com
In-Reply-To: <87mzei29zy.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Message-Id: <20060418182737.3A09771D640@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:27:37 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc:
Subject: Re: Comments on minutes
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org

jas sed:
> > 13h10 - 13h25: `RFC 3978 Update', presented by Scott Bradner
> >
> > - The purpose of this document ((draft-ietf-ipr-rules-update-03)
> > came originally out of an IPR WG meeting we had quite a while ago
> > where the consensus was `the IETF should ask for additional rights
> > from the submitters of contributions to the IETF'.  The additional
> > rights are for 3rd parties to make extracts of any kind (e.g. to
> > copy pieces of IETF documents and include them in documentation, or
> > on a web page)
> 
> Scott's current draft (which is -04, not -03, btw), does not grant
> those additional rights for 3rd parties, as far as I can see.  I think
> this gives a flawed representation of what Scott's draft would solve.

I think what is in the minutes is accurate - the ID asks for these 
rights from authors but does not say anything about granting the
rights to others

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email