RE: SCSI MIB: Open Issues
"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com> Mon, 30 December 2002 15:25 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) id gBUFPC528320 for ips-outgoing; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 10:25:12 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f
Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id gBUFP6W28309 for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 10:25:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net (cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.110.250.125]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36450B62; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:25:00 -0600 (CST)
Received: from cceexc17.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.110.250.84]) by cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:24:59 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6344.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: SCSI MIB: Open Issues
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:24:59 -0600
Message-ID: <78AF3C342AEAEF4BA33B35A8A15668C60296E71B@cceexc17.americas.cpqcorp.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: SCSI MIB: Open Issues
Thread-Index: AcKqrgr8ZNLfSIh/TvKCf5fqo/Z/hAFaOm7g
From: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>
To: Michele Hallak - Stamler <michele@sanrad.com>, "SCSI MIB (E-mail)" <scsi-mib@external.cisco.com>
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Dec 2002 15:24:59.0792 (UTC) FILETIME=[9DCBF100:01C2B017]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ece.cmu.edu id gBUFPAW28317
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk
> Hi,
> I compiled and made all the changes that were
> suggested/commented in the different emails.
> However, I have some open issues and I would like help from
> the group regarding them.
> See my questions preceded by MHS>>>>>>
>
> **************************************************************
> ************************************************
> From Robert Elliott email:
> subject: RE: draft-ietf-ips-scsi-mib-04 comments.
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 22:28
>
>
> " scsiLuOutQueueFullStatus OBJECT-TYPE
> SYNTAX Counter32
> MAX-ACCESS read-only
> STATUS current
> DESCRIPTION
> " This object represents the number of queue full statuses
> received by this logical unit."
> ::= { scsiLuEntry 14 } "
>
> COMMENT: There is no QUEUE FULL in SCSI-3; that's a SCSI-2 term. Use
> "TASK SET FULL".
>
> MHS>>>>>>>>>> Knowing that we are SCSI-2 compliant and not
> SCSI-3, how should we call this MIB object?
>
I think you may be confusing SCSI-2/3 with SAM-2/3.
The architecture standards in order of age are:
SCSI-2 (finished in 1993)
SCSI-3 SAM (SCSI Architecture Model; finished in 1995)
SCSI-3 SAM-2 (SCSI Architecture Model - 2; finished in 2002)
SCSI-3 SAM-3 (SCSI Architecture Model - 3; in development)
The SCSI MIB (and iSCSI) are SCSI-3 projects, developed in the SAM-2 and
SAM-3 timeframe.
--
Rob Elliott, elliott@hp.com
Hewlett-Packard Industry Standard Server Storage Advanced Technology
https://ecardfile.com/id/RobElliott
- SCSI MIB: Open Issues Michele Hallak - Stamler
- Re: SCSI MIB: Open Issues Sajay Selvaraj
- RE: SCSI MIB: Open Issues Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
- RE: SCSI MIB: Open Issues KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)
- RE: SCSI MIB: Open Issues Black_David
- Re: SCSI MIB: Open Issues Keith McCloghrie