[Ips] Storm WG: Progress update
Black_David@emc.com Thu, 14 May 2009 23:28 UTC
Return-Path: <Black_David@emc.com>
X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AEB3A6BCE; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRFvyePpcSU7; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BABB3A686C; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI03.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.23]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id n4ENU8C5008145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 May 2009 19:30:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (nagas.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.15]) by hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (Tablus Interceptor); Thu, 14 May 2009 19:30:02 -0400
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.53]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.3.2mp/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id n4ENU15t021979; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:30:01 -0400
Received: from CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com ([10.254.89.202]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 14 May 2009 19:30:01 -0400
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:29:01 -0400
Message-ID: <9FA859626025B64FBC2AF149D97C944A02B76719@CORPUSMX80A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Storm WG: Progress update
Thread-Index: AcnU68MKP8w1/43XSuCjAymoGT4jUA==
To: storm@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2009 23:30:01.0384 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6F2BA80:01C9D4EB]
X-EMM-EM: Active
Cc: imss@ietf.org, ips@ietf.org, Black_David@emc.com, rddp@ietf.org
Subject: [Ips] Storm WG: Progress update
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ips>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:28:38 -0000
Progress is being made on the proposed storm WG - I plan to post a new version of the proposed charter next week. There have been a few minor changes: - The new iSCSI features work needs to include appropriate updates to the iSCSI MIB. - Similarly, deprecating iFCP Address Translation mode will need to include an update to the iFCP MIB. - It's useful to reference RFC 3723 for security and state that changes are not planned. This is also a good time to remind people to subscribe to the storm@ietf.org mailing list. Once the WG is formed, cross-posting to the other mailing lists will cease. To subscribe, please visit: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm . Also, this is another reminder that the rddp@ietf.org list will be shut down in favor of the storm@ietf.org mailing list in the near future. In addition, I've run into a minor hiccup involving access to T10 (SCSI) and T11 (Fibre Channel) standards documents. The INCITS access rules changed recently to prohibit general public access to final drafts of approved standards (access is available to anyone whose company belongs to T10 or T11). This is not as big a problem as it might appear, because our primary need in IETF is access to working drafts that remain publicly accessible. An important specific example is that part of the iSCSI update work to SAM-4 is to specify a number of new task management functions, including QUERY TASK. It turns out that T10 has made a minor, but important, change to QUERY TASK in their ongoing SAM-5 work and hence the appropriate base document for this iSCSI work appears to be revision 1 of SAM-5, which is publicly accessible. There are a number of other examples in which the current working draft of the standard is an appropriate reference document for the proposed storm WG work. This should not be mistaken for a complete answer - some access will be needed to final drafts of standards (e.g., those referenced by RFCs that are to be updated). A means for providing this access to IETF participants has been worked out with T10. I expect the corresponding means to work with T11, but I need to finish double-checking that before explaining how it'll work. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ----------------------------------------------------
- [Ips] Storm WG: Progress update Black_David
- [Ips] Access to T10 and T11 documents Black_David