New IPS draft: SCSI command ordering considerations
"Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com> Tue, 10 June 2003 23:10 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h5ANA4326220 for <ipsml@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 461A49C; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9813F92; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:10:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 47EE3894A; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B805893D for <ips-outgoing@sos.ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 02C9992; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id D7C5F9C; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5C992 for <ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 363) id 1F1AB894F; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:46 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu
Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7621893D for <ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 814E37C; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:43 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 55F728B; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from atlrel8.hp.com (atlrel8.hp.com [156.153.255.206]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4597C for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rosemail.rose.hp.com (rosemail.rose.hp.com [15.96.64.26]) by atlrel8.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F02B1C00BE6 for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from swathi (dhcp-roseor-bdi176.rose.hp.com [15.23.138.176]) by rosemail.rose.hp.com with SMTP (8.7.1/8.7.3 SMKit7.02) id QAA07981 for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <006701c32fa5$5b6d1290$b08a170f@rose.hp.com>
From: "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>
To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: New IPS draft: SCSI command ordering considerations
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:08:14 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10 version=2.50
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
I haven't seen the I-D announcement yet, but a new official WG I-D is now published at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-command-ordering-00.pdf http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-command-ordering-00.txt The new technical content is in section 7 ("Reservation Considerations"), added per David Black's suggestion. There were numerous other editorial fixes/improvements, based on earlier list clarifications and other reviews. I think the draft is ready for a WG Last Call. David and/or Elizabeth, please consider the draft for a WG Last Call. -- Mallikarjun Mallikarjun Chadalapaka Networked Storage Architecture Network Storage Solutions Hewlett-Packard MS 5668 Roseville CA 95747 cbm@rose.hp.com
- New IPS draft: SCSI command ordering consideratio… Mallikarjun C.