[Ips] SCSI MIB status update

Black_David@emc.com Wed, 24 March 2004 00:23 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA14085 for <ips-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:23:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5wAJ-0007je-HH for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:22:39 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2O0Mdwg029735 for ips-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:22:39 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5wAJ-0007jW-7p for ips-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:22:39 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA14057 for <ips-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:22:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5wAH-0005fU-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:22:37 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5w9V-0005b6-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:21:50 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5w8l-0005W6-00 for ips-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:21:03 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5w8j-0007MP-8h; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:21:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5w8b-0007Ld-Kz for ips@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:20:53 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA13969 for <ips@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:20:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5w8a-0005U1-00 for ips@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:20:52 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5w7a-0005O7-00 for ips@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:19:50 -0500
Received: from mxic2.corp.emc.com ([128.221.12.9]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5w7A-0005IZ-00 for ips@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:19:24 -0500
Received: by mxic2.corp.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <HQHDZ5CQ>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:18:46 -0500
Message-ID: <B459CE1AFFC52D4688B2A5B842CA35EA7A578C@corpmx14.us.dg.com>
To: ips@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:17:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: [Ips] SCSI MIB status update
Sender: ips-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ips-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60

The recent status of drafts email said:

> -- SCSI MIB
> 
> draft-ietf-ips-scsi-mib-06.txt
> 	To be a proposed standard RFC.  Has completed WG Last Call been
> 	revised to address issues found by the WG's MIB expert. Has been
> 	forwarded to ADs/IESG.  Currently in Expert Review.

It has been pointed out that this is incorrect, as Expert Review
comments have been received for this MIB.  See:

https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/ips/current/msg00318.html

So, the summary of MIB status should be:

 	- 4 MIBs have completed WG Last Call with all technical
        issues resolved	and are in Expert Review at the IESG.
 	- 2 MIBs have completed Expert Review and need to be revised
        to respond to the Expert Review Comments.

instead of 5 and 1.  The SCSI MIB authors have been asked
to produce a new draft to respond to these comments.  I apologize
for the oversight.

Thanks,
--David

----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips