IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves?

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 November 2015 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BD91A1BB0 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNZCh0XzL7NA for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 756691A1B92 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so28662774wme.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:45:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QeYrRVaBaUmb7Q7nurp2ZqXaIqYANXc1OZMwdxKdrrw=; b=beq4StqNU2Q7KGk7ommnsfCsHQItjhTZkLeOJVpVlN13mTThpXVxSHEKbz2eS7gRm9 VLtK8xT4686YdK3YpDF8JK9dppFnQY0dz7w5cTszexnfAjWNy6sVGKkk+M5vgBXxeSFh c/Ix1h8oMNSS6eRNH36Z4/rGjV7EPTIPl47NTP9+Yxl5bvEGX8NHhnuDRCuhKSNPyAnN rGWR8uLlRohtd2BHpVAABjnw5NuxMD5tRllsSyXfyr0AdU07KDoKYH7VjSF7LK99rhAK +phZzM63e7uLhYlMp4rV1vSlnwgdwc5MbzHjqYnDXE3N1FR6YNV+QXDFMQAKHjm47rCB Qa7A==
X-Received: by 10.28.45.72 with SMTP id t69mr27660619wmt.32.1447328737143; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:45:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.24.249.179] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm14034259wjz.7.2015.11.12.03.45.35 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <87bnaztti1.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:45:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <24AFF548-28A6-422E-95D0-9C4AEBDC958B@gmail.com>
References: <87bnaztti1.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/-7BYY1HfAwRwVwR8BEZMLyQd-4g>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:45:40 -0000

> On 12 Nov 2015, at 12:13 PM, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:
> 
> There have been no additional comment on the list, and we have had one
> positive review from an implementer [1].  Is there any reason to wait
> further with WG last calling this document?  Its dependency on
> draft-irtf-cfrg-curves is in the RFC editors queue already.
> 
> Thanks,
> /Simon
> 
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/vS1sy2ROhA6twEe7QwX1ISXtLVM

OK, so here’s two comments:
 1. See Ilari’s pr for RFC4492bis [2]. Do we want similar name changes?
 2. We make no mention of EdDSA signatures. I know they should just work with RFC 7427, but do we want to mention them and give the OIDs?

Yoav

[2] https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/pull/16

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email